Laserfiche WebLink
4. The proposed use, with conditions, will not be injurious to the public <br /> health, safety, welfare, decency order, comfort, convenience, appearance, <br /> or prosperity of the City. <br /> 5. The proposed use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of <br /> surrounding property. <br /> 6. The proposed use, with conditions, will not impede the normal and orderly <br /> development and improvement of surrounding vacant properties. <br /> 7. The proposed use will utilize onsite sewer and water systems. There will <br /> be a slight increase of traffic on County Road 107. The public cost for <br /> facilities and services for the proposed level mnt will not be <br /> detrimental to the economic welfare of the Comm <br /> 8. The proposed use will be accessed by a private <br /> 9. The proposed development contains adequat t parking. <br /> 10.The proposed use will not generate any o e 've o mes, dust, noise, <br /> or vibrations that will be a nuisance to o ng pro es. <br /> 11. The proposed use will not destroy a natural or sceni res. There <br /> are no known historical feature ajor 'gnficance subject <br /> Property <br /> 12.The proposed use will promote the pre an control o pollution of <br /> ground and surface wate All storm generated on the subject <br /> property will be contained <br /> 13. The proposed expansion re q nditiona ermit as set forth in <br /> the original Conditional Use mi by Cr ing County in 2000. <br /> And subject to the fo ondition: <br /> 1. The Ian pla ated 3/20 all be implemented in full. The <br /> landscaping s e ined an ept free of weeds and debris. <br /> All me e" on caul <br /> APPLI t Leann ve on <br /> Applcan uests t ezone from Agriculture to Forest Management <br /> Mr. Burslie e ed t taff Report. Applicant was represented by Pat <br /> Trotter, Stone Surveying. <br /> Mr. Burslie explai ed that the Planning Commission would need to make a <br /> recommendation to the City Council. Planning Commission Member Hallan <br /> asked if Staff had considered the Rural Residential zone rather than Forest <br /> Management. Mr. Burslie explained Staff had recommended Forest Management <br /> due to the Future Land Use Map. <br /> Mr. Trottier stated Forest Management gives the property owner more flexibility. <br /> Mr. Burslie stated Rural Residential would have created flag lots with narrow <br /> access points and larges areas to the rear. <br /> MINUTES 4 <br /> Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br /> April 18, 2013 <br />