My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9A - Minutes 071813
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
2013
>
08-15-2013 Planning Commission Meeting
>
9A - Minutes 071813
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2016 4:01:58 PM
Creation date
4/25/2016 4:01:58 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Cooper explained he had sent a letter and pictures in May documenting their <br /> efforts to complete the restoration agreed upon at the September, 2012 Planning <br /> Commission meeting. He had assumed this issue was over but then received a <br /> letter from Bittner stating another site visit was necessary. <br /> Mr. Burslie stated that he had conducted a site visit that afternoon, along with <br /> Bittner and Planning Commission Member Oraskovich and that the restoration <br /> met the requirements laid out at the September, 2012 meeting. <br /> Mr. Burslie explained that this type of violation, where the opers unknowingly <br /> worked on their shoreline not aware a permit was require s to be <br /> documented as resolved. We were on site today notin plantings are in and <br /> the rip rap is in place. The vegetation needs to grow is comfortable with <br /> the restoration and to remove this from the Violati o ,List. <br /> A motion was made by James Oraskovich, s dedy Deb Br o o remove <br /> this item from the Violation List. All me voted`,',aye". Motio / d. Staff <br /> will remove this from the Violation List. la C ission Mem r <br /> Oraskovich reiterated to Mr. Cooper that this ere will be no more <br /> monitoring. V', <br /> Mr. Burslie stated that it is going to 10 years f' shoreline to take <br /> hold and be in compliance. He furthdg sta the C ers had restored as <br /> directed and would be off the list; no re e ' be written. <br /> Mr. Cooper asked ' ey w oing to b eld hostage for what Mother Nature <br /> does over the ye // f'w do this end? & <br /> Mr. Burslie that oo avated an historic ice ridge;they <br /> would h ed an annu ice ridge. The City wants both sides of <br /> the d to match. <br /> i' <br /> Mr. Coo{ sk. what pen if it doesn't ever grow to match. Restoration was <br /> a horrible 'on for e body. What is future monitoring going to do? What <br /> are you looki /r? OF <br /> Mr. Burslie explai he Ordinance and what the City's expectations are. <br /> Mr. Cooper stated that it will never grow in as expected. It took 13 years to get <br /> ugly like the City likes it, natural. <br /> Mr. Burslie explained the City doesn't actively go out looking for violations,they <br /> work off of complaints. The City will not be going back out to look unless we get a <br /> complaint. <br /> Review Variance Application Form <br /> MINUTES 3 <br /> Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br /> July 18, 2013 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.