My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06.01 - Planning Commission Report
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2013
>
09-03-2013 Council Meeting
>
06.01 - Planning Commission Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2014 9:35:32 AM
Creation date
12/17/2013 2:49:44 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
not meet screening requirements in the Code. The computer business is a side <br />job with no intent to expand it. <br />The 8 conditions for the Used Automobile Dealership were gathered from other <br />Conditional Use Permits for Used Car Lots issued in the City. <br />When asked if the number of vehicles can be limited, Mr. Burslie stated a <br />compatible number could be agreed upon between the Planning Commission and <br />the applicant. Mr. Burslie further stated the area identified on the site plan, <br />minus the io-foot setback, could be the compatible area. <br />Mr. Burslie pointed out that if the computer business were to expand, the <br />Conditional Use Permit would need to be amended. <br />Mr. Walberg questioned Condition Number �: It states vehicles cannot be within <br />lo feet of property line. They are already 15o feet back from the road; another io <br />feet will put them in the driveway. Mr. Burslie clarified io-foot side yard setback. <br />He reminded him that he cannot park within the highway right-of-way. The State <br />will not allow it. <br />Mr. Walberg further pointed out that in regard to the number of vehicles allowed, <br />the Planning Commission had a chance to rule on Schoeb's lot and Dotty's lot <br />with no conditions on either. Staff pointed out Schoeb is restricted to bituminous <br />area only. <br />It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that he could fit 4o to 50 <br />vehicles in the hatched areas of his site plan. Mr. Walberg stated he is only <br />allowed 25% coverage on the property. The Planning Commission reiterated that <br />the hatched,����,is his limit, no vehicle number. <br />, ., <br />With regard to Condition Number �, what about vehicles not ready for sale, not <br />repaired. It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that any vehicles on <br />the property, including purchased vehicles and for sale vehicles, except for <br />customer vehicles coming to the lot, all have to fit on hatched areas. He will be <br />allowed to store, display or park a vehicle on hatched areas only. <br />Mr. Burslie noted the southeast hatched area indicates the size as 5i' X 56'. He <br />asked Mr. Walberg if that should state 15' or 51'. Planning Commission Member <br />Hallan added the lengths listed on the site plan and the size should be 51' X 56'. <br />The site plan is not to scale. <br />Condition Number � should state: "Vehicles shall be restricted to the areas <br />indicated on the site plan. Vehicles may not be parked within io feet of a <br />property line." The legend should also state "Parking areas for owner vehicles". <br />With regard to Condition Number 5, Abandoned Vehicles, does not mean each <br />vehicle is licensed; he can use dealer plates. Our ordinance does not apply by the <br />MINUTES 4 <br />Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br />August 15, 2013 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.