Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Member Engels inquired if there is a 3 story walkout lakehome on <br /> the lake? Ann Beaver stated she doesn't have that information with her. Mr. Steffens <br /> stated some of the villas are 2 story units with lofts. When asked how high, Travis Miller <br /> stated under 40 feet. Ann Beaver stated their objection is the 3 story part is 185 feet <br /> long. Mr. Steffens reminded the Planning Commission of the pictures he supplied last <br /> month; the existing lodge was barely visible. He is trying to minimize the visual impact; <br /> that is why he is trying to build at the 1210 elevation. <br /> Ann Beaver asked what the topo levels were on the site plan from last month. Planning <br /> Commission Member Hallan stated they were 2 foot minors and the others are 10 foot. <br /> Planning Commission Member Hallan stated the lodge height technically meets the <br /> ordinance,which is lax. For the Planning Commission to make it a condition to make <br /> the height less than 25 feet, it would reduce it to a 2 story facility. At this point we have <br /> to say yay or nay to that. When you actually look at the site plan,try to fit it in in the <br /> southeast corner as you have on the northwest corner. Try to keep it at the 1210 to avoid <br /> a lot of earth work. It would help balance and go into the hill less. It will look <br /> differently after they work out all the specifics. He further stated he visited the site the <br /> previous evening. This is an artist's`rendering. The lodge will be set back further from <br /> the lake. If the trees that are there are left,there will be a lot of screening,but if Units 37 <br /> to 4o are built and trees are removed, it will be very visible. Mr. Steffens stated they will <br /> locate the trees for Preliminary Plat. <br /> Planning Commission Member Hallan stated whether the east side is used for a picnic <br /> area or a beach area, it is a more intensive use. Mr. Steffens stated the north side of the <br /> dock would be for the picnic area and the south side would be for the beach area. Chair <br /> Seils read the comments from Planning Commission Member Brown regarding the <br /> additional beach area. <br /> Planning Commission Member Hallan stated the boat ramp is proposed to be moved but <br /> needs to be permitted by the DNR. He asked if the boathouse will also be moved. Mr. <br /> Steffens stated it stays in its present location. It cannot be torn down and rebuilt. <br /> Planning Commission Member Hallan further stated that the golf carts are motorized <br /> vehicles;they are not being pedaled by human beings. He doesn't have a problem with <br /> the additional beach,but golf carts are hard to police. They provide easy access to boats. <br /> People now can drive to dock system #1. Mr. Steffens stated 8 homeowners own golf <br /> carts and drive to all 3 dock systems. That is what prompted him to ask for this — ease <br /> to access boat docks. Planning Commission Member Hallan stated people can drive to <br /> the existing beach; what was the reason to have the additional beach at dock system #2 <br /> and not dock system #3? Mr. Steffens stated it was the contours. <br /> MINUTES 5 <br /> Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br /> February 20, 2014 <br />