My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
pz 012116
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
2016
>
02-18-2016 Planning Commission Meeting
>
pz 012116
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/21/2016 2:38:44 PM
Creation date
4/21/2016 2:38:35 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Minutes 2 <br />Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br />January 21, 2016 <br />Conditional Use Permits and allowed uses. An Interim Use Permit would be another <br />tool to use. Mr. Burslie requested a motion to initiate an Ordinance Amendment to <br />include Interim Use in the Ordinance. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Member Habein inquired if this could be used against the City, <br />such as a use that our Ordinance would not allow would then be allowed through an <br />Interim Use. <br /> <br />Mr. Burslie stated the City would determine which uses would best require an Interim <br />Use. This would allow the City to put end dates on permits. <br /> <br />A motion was made by Planning Commission Member Habein, seconded by <br />Chair Engels, to initiate the process to amend the Ordinance to include <br />Interim Uses. <br /> <br />Council Member Akerson asked how an Interim Use Permit would work. Would the <br />permit be allowed for a certain length of time and then the City would pull their permit? <br /> <br />Mr. Burslie stated during the approval process the applicant would be asked what the <br />duration of their business or use would be, such as a gravel pit. <br /> <br />Council Member Akerson asked if this could be tied in with favoritism. Mr. Burslie <br />stated an Interim Use Permit is identical to a Conditional Use Permit except it has an <br />end date. The applicant could request an extension but it could not be transferable. A <br />Conditional Use Permit runs with the land. <br /> <br />Motion carried 4-1. Planning Commission Member Wilson opposed. <br />Planning Commission Member Hallan abstained as he had not been present <br />for the entire discussion. <br /> <br />e. Liaisons at Council Meetings <br />Dawn Bittner explained that having liaisons from the Council and Planning Commission <br />have been very beneficial in the past. She reminded the Planning Commission to trade <br />with someone if they cannot attend. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission Members reviewed the schedule and made modifications. <br />Staff will send out a revised schedule. <br /> <br /> <br />OLD BUSINESS: <br />a. Extractive Use Ordinance – Update by Council Member Akerson <br />Council Member Akerson reported he spoke with Commissioner Thiede regarding a <br />gravel tax and was told the County is in a bad place regarding their roads. The County <br />determined it is best suited for a county-wide sales tax. A gravel tax would add cost to
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.