My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
pz 061815
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
2015
>
07-16-2015 Planning Commission Meeting
>
pz 061815
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/21/2016 2:20:13 PM
Creation date
4/21/2016 2:19:48 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />MINUTES 3 <br />Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br />June 18, 2015 <br /> <br />Mr. Burslie explained that the Planning Commission has been meeting at 6:00 PM to <br />cover discussion items that could be included within the meeting agenda and asked the <br />Planning Commission whether or not to change the meeting time to 6:00 PM. <br /> <br />It was the consensus of the Planning Commission to change the meeting time to 6:00 <br />PM, but to allow the flexibility for applicants to schedule their public hearings at 7:00 <br />PM, if necessary. <br /> <br />Planning Commission meetings will begin at 6:00 PM with public hearings. If we find <br />this new time is not working, it will be readdressed at that time. <br /> <br /> <br />Vice Chair Brown opened the Public Hearings. <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARINGS <br />APPLICANT: City of Pequot Lakes <br />Applicant proposes an Ordinance Amendment Regarding Rural Residential <br />Zoning Classification <br />Mr. Burslie explained the Staff Report. <br /> <br />Public Comment: None. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Member Hallan pointed out that the 15% impervious coverage is <br />all that will be controlling the impervious surfaces. The maximum square footage could <br />be doubled instead. <br /> <br />Mr. Burslie stated we could change the maximum impervious coverage if the Planning <br />Commission is not comfortable with removing the maximum accessory structure size. <br />Planning Commission Member Habein stated he would rather see the amendment as <br />proposed. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Member Hallan stated he had wanted to point out that very large <br />accessory structures could be built. This is very liberal, although the maximum building <br />height will help determine how large structures can be built. <br /> <br />A motion was made by Planning Commission Member Wilson, seconded by <br />Planning Commission Member Hallan, to recommend the City Council <br />amend the Ordinance as presented, based on the following Findings of Fact: <br /> <br />1. The “purpose and intent” of the Rural Residential Zone is, “To provide a zoning <br />classification that allows for low-density residential development. Development <br />in this zone is without municipal utility service and with only limited demand for
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.