Laserfiche WebLink
<br />MINUTES 4 <br />Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br />March 19, 2015 <br /> <br /> <br />Mr. Larson stated this is a residential agricultural area with no speed limit. Mr. <br />Wickham stated their drivers are professionals, they drive every day and have never had <br />an accident. He acknowledges their concerns, but this is where the gravel is and this is <br />the only area where it is allowed. <br /> <br />Mr. Larson stated the roadway needs to be posted and signed. <br /> <br />PUBLIC COMMENT CLOSED <br /> <br />Planning Commission Member Wilson stated he couldn’t understand why the speed <br />limit can’t be taken care of, as well as the condition of the roads. He spent his life in <br />construction and the haul roads had to be in as good of condition or better when <br />completed. Mr. Wickham stated if the jobs are for the state or county, the contractor <br />needs to bond for it, list it as a haul road and it has to be as good as or better than <br />before. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Member Habein stated that everyone blames Anderson Brothers <br />for the traffic. These roads have become a shortcut from County Road 16 over to County <br />Road 11 and the traffic has increased. This is not Anderson Brothers fault; the fault is <br />that the road was improved. Mr. Habein further stated that Mr. Wickham has stated <br />several times that traffic will not be increased, just a different access. If traffic is going <br />to stay the same and the road condition will stay the same or deteriorate as it would <br />without this approval, we need to forget these issues. The City should start considering <br />speed limit signs and striping the road. The hill needs stripes for safety. We need to <br />consider our part in the safety of that road. Signs and striping aren’t that expensive. <br />Other issues deserve more attention instead of worrying about the traffic; the road <br />traffic is not going to change. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Member Engels asked if the haul times could be limited to during <br />school hours. Notices could be sent out when operating around the clock. He further <br />asked if this needed to be approved for 10 years. Mr. Wickham stated he would be open <br />for a review every two years, but not to renew the CUP every 2 years. <br /> <br />City Planner Burslie stated the application is for a CUP and it runs with the property. It <br />is good for the life of the property and the City can review CUP’s at any time. As long as <br />the conditions are being met, it is good. If the conditions are not being met, the City can <br />pull the permit. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Member Brown asked if there had been a pit at this location <br />previously. Staff advised Bauerly or Knife River had a temporary pit approximately 7 to <br />8 years ago. Ms. Brown asked what normal operating hours are. Mr. Wickham stated