My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7A - Metes & Bounds Subdivision
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
2015
>
01-15-2015 Planning Commission Meeting
>
7A - Metes & Bounds Subdivision
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/21/2016 1:53:03 PM
Creation date
4/21/2016 1:52:55 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Pequot Lakes Staff Report 7(a) - 6 <br />January 15, 2015 <br /> <br />11. Lots requiring variances to allow their use for the intended purposes or <br />requiring holding tanks for sewage shall not be allowed. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Staff Findings: Staff provides the following findings of fact for consideration: <br /> <br />1. The subject properties are properly zoned “Rural Residential”. <br />2. The lot widths of the proposed parcels meet the minimum standard of 200 feet. <br />3. The proposed parcels meet the minimum area requirements of the Rural <br />Residential zone. <br />4. The “Adams Tract” currently contains a non-conforming dwelling and a non- <br />conforming accessory structure. The subdivision does not increase the level of <br />non-conformity. <br />5. The “Hendrickson Tract” currently contains a non-conforming dwelling and a <br />non-conforming accessory structure. The subdivision does not increase the level <br />of non-conformity. <br />6. The subject properties are not adjacent to the municipal water and wastewater <br />utilities. All three parcels contain a private sewer system and a private water <br />well. <br />7. The properties are suitable in their natural state for the intended purpose and <br />these lot splits would not be harmful to the health, safety, or welfare of future <br />residents or of the community. <br />8. The applicants are not proposing any provisions for water-based recreation. <br />9. The proposed lot layout meets the requirements of the ordinance. <br />10. The proposed side lot lines are at right angles to the existing road line and the <br />property line of the adjacent property. <br />11. Each of the proposed parcels has at least 33-feet of frontage on public right-of- <br />way. <br />12. The subject property meets the requirements of the code for stromwater <br />management. <br />13. There are no public streets proposed within the development. <br />14. The proposed subdivision would bring the existing dwellings on the “Adams <br />Tract” and the “Hendrickson Track” into conformity so they are not encroaching <br />on the side yard setback. <br /> <br /> <br />Planning Commission Direction: The Planning Commission can approve the metes <br />and bounds subdivision, deny the metes and bounds subdivision, or table the request if <br />additional information is needed. If the motion is for approval or denial, findings of fact <br />should be cited. <br /> <br />Staff Recommendation: The proposed parcels meet the requirements of the Rural <br />Residential Zone. Staff recommends the application be approved with no conditions. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.