My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06 - Planning and Zoning Report
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2012
>
05-01-2012 Council Meeting
>
06 - Planning and Zoning Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2014 3:52:11 PM
Creation date
12/16/2013 3:03:22 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Walberg was in attendance. Bittner explained the Planning Commission approval in <br />`... July, 2011 and that Mr. Walberg has indicated his plans for repair, storage and salvage on <br />a site plan. <br />Mr. Walberg clarified what is taking place. He is not doing auto salvage; he has had 2 <br />cars in 6 months to salvage. He was being thorough. He doesn't plan to do any repair <br />work to customer autos; just the cars that are for sale, only his cars. He is not advertising <br />to do auto repair. He will do simple things that don't involve oil. He is not set up to do <br />that and does not wish to do that type of work. <br />Mr. Adams asked if preparing vehicles for sale change the use r. ohn stated the <br />Planning Commission tried to be accommodating to allow t ail use. The question is <br />whether it still fits the narrow definition or do we need t t the CUP process. <br />Mr. Walberg stated he should have brought it to th 'n Comm s attention, but <br />he assumed they would have known he would b ing cars for sale; th standard <br />operating procedures. <br />The drawing was supplied by Mr. Walberg. He deci� <br />there is no monetary advantage to d' imself. He j <br />to repair. <br />Mr. Marohn stated it was Staff's recommi <br />� owner would need to sign application. <br />plan. A CUP defines 'ties will ; <br />� <br />Mr. Walberg stat� <br />Walberg also stated <br />he was not <br />to <br />to break down any autos; <br />its to have a few in the back <br />a CUP. The property <br />be required, just a site <br />not t e place. <br />and as a business, didn't want to do that. Mr. <br />' e earl' that he would need to do repair work; <br />� ith the Planning Commission in 2011. <br />Mr. erg suggeste 'ting ber of cars in the rear for repair. He would like <br />15 i t t for sale an few i ck. The cars in the back are not for sale; they have <br />issues. T ould be sto unti they were fixed. He is not dealing with any fluids. <br />He could not ly the av ge number of days cars remain in the back. <br />A motion was ma m Adams, seconded by Bill Habein, to continue with the <br />current program and it the number of cars in the repair booth to three; 18 total vehicles <br />on the lot. Motion carried. Cheri Seils abstained and Chairman Pederson did not vote. <br />b. Fence Discussion <br />Bittner explained she had received a request for a 6 foot fence where only 60 inch fences <br />are allowed. The applicant stated a 60 inch fence is more expensive as premade panels <br />are either 48 inches or 72 inches. <br />MINUTES 3 <br />Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br />April 19, 2012 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.