Laserfiche WebLink
4• <br />5• <br />6. <br />7• <br />. <br />. <br />� <br />11. <br />The proposed use, with conditions, will not be injurious to the public <br />health, safety, welfare, decency order, comfort, convenience, appearance, <br />or prosperity of the City. <br />The proposed use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of <br />surrounding property. <br />The proposed use, with conditions, will not impede the normal and orderly <br />development and improvement of surrounding vacant properties. <br />The proposed use will utilize onsite sewer and water systems. There will <br />be a slight increase of traffic on County Road 10�. The public cost for <br />facilities and services for the proposed development will not be <br />detrimental to the economic welfare of the commun'it`�:'' ;., <br />The proposed use will be accessed by a private drive. <br />The proposed development contains adequate off-street parking. <br />The proposed use will not generate any offensive odor, fumes, dust, noise, <br />or vibrations that will be a nuisance to n�`'��l�o�ing properties. <br />The proposed use will not destroy a��natural or scenic features. There <br />are no known historical features;d�£;:.mai�r 'significance on th� subject <br />property. <br />i2. The proposed use will promote the pr <br />ground and surface waters. All sto <br />property will be contained onsite. <br />i3. The proposed expansion requires y�;Cc <br />the original Conditional Use Pe�mit'iss <br />And subject to the follb����ondition: <br />r,�,;. <br />1. The landscap <br />landscaping s <br />All <br />Applicant <br />Mr. Burslie <br />Trottier, St� <br />plan dated 3/20 <br />(�e maintained ar <br />"aye". <br />ion anc� control of pollution of <br />��r.; generated on the subject <br />itional U��jPermit as set forth in <br />� by Cro,�v Wing County in 2000. <br />„ /� . <br />�11 be implemented in full. The <br />free of weeds and debris. <br />�ezone from Agriculture to Forest Management <br />�taff Report. Applicant was represented by Pat <br />Surveying. <br />Mr. Burslie explairied that the Planning Commission would need to make a <br />recommendation to the City Council. Planning Commission Member Hallan <br />asked if Staff had considered the Rural Residential zone rather than Forest <br />Management. Mr. Burslie explained Staff had recommended Forest Management <br />due to the Future Land Use Map. <br />Mr. Trottier stated Forest Management gives the property owner more flexibility. <br />Mr. Burslie stated Rural Residential would have created flag lots with narrow <br />access points and larges areas to the rear. <br />MINUTES 4 <br />Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br />April 18, 2013 <br />