Laserfiche WebLink
i. The subject property is currently zoned Forest Management. The <br />property owner has applied to rezone "Tract B" to Rural Residential and <br />the "Remainder Tract" to Commercial. <br />2. Each of the proposed tracts meets the requirements of their respective <br />proposed zoning districts. <br />3. "Tract A" meets the requirements of the Forest Management Zone, "Tract <br />B" meets the requirements of the Rural Residential Zone and the <br />"Remainder Tract" meets the requirements of the Commercial Zone. <br />4. The single existing structure on the subject property meets the <br />requirements of the Commercial Zone. �„ <br />5. None of the proposed parcels contain a private sey,�,,��S�y�tem. Each of the <br />proposed parcels has sufficient space for the installation of private sewer <br />systems. <br />6. The property is suitable in its natural state f�r the intended purpose and <br />this lot split would not be harmful to the�i���1,t�i; safety, or yvelfare of future <br />residents or of the community. �`��' � ;��. <br />�� <br />�. The applicant is not proposing any provisions 'f�r water-base�;��Q�eation. <br />;- <br />8. The proposed lot layout meets the requiremer���%A� the ordinar�'C'�. <br />9. The proposed side lot lines are at right angles'to t�e existing road line and <br />the property line of the adjacent property. <br />lo. Each of the proposed parcels contains more ���n 33-feet of frontage on <br />, <br />public right-of-way. : � ' <br />il. Each of the proposed properti;es riieets the requi�ements of the code for <br />stromwater management. �<% <br />12. There are no public streets propo�ed within the development. <br />All members voted "aye". Motion carried. <br />c. Off-site ,Signage, Discussion. � ; ' <br />;„ <br />Sittner expla'iiied that Staff has been contacted by an individual requesting to <br />rent space in order to place a sig�, fqr her business, after being informed she <br />could not just place a sign as of�';site signs are not allowed. She had indicated to <br />Staff that she may rent a closet to store supplies. <br />It was the consensus of ��e Planning Commission that this would not be an <br />allowed use. A Sign Concept Plan would have allowed something more than <br />outlined in the ordinance. <br />The Planning Commission further stated that she would need to occupy space <br />and have a physical presence to advertise her business with a sign. <br />Staff was directed to inform her that an Ordinance Amendment may be an <br />option, but to also let her know how discussions on signs have gone in the past. <br />d. Trailside Park: <br />Mr. Burslie explained the City Council has asked the Planning Commission for a <br />recommendation to acquire the Trailside Park property. The park is currently <br />MINUTES <br />Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br />April 18, 2013 <br />E <br />