Laserfiche WebLink
� 3� :. �I�§I.,� , ���k I��� � �. <br />it wa'�+:+ �7�'� �i' �C '�i'�' „ '�,I <br />Page 3 <br />March 13, 2013 <br />• The nature of the decision, <br />• The nature of the financial decision, <br />• The number of interested officials, <br />• The need for the interested officials to make the decision, and <br />• Other means available—opportunity for xeview. <br />Exam�les of different situatior.s invalving a counci?member's property ownersh�p can <br />help to understand whether a conflict of interest exists. <br />At one extreme is the adoption of a new zoning ordinance or a comprehensive revision of <br />an existing ordinance that may impact all property in the city. In this situation, the <br />councilmember's interest is not personal and he or she should be able to participate. If this was <br />not allowed, such ardinances might never be adopted. <br />At the other extreme is the application for a zoning variance or special use permit that only <br />applies to a councilmember's property. Such a specific, personal interest will likely disqualify the <br />member from participating in the proceedings because the councilmember's own personal interest <br />is so distinct from the public interest that the member cannot fairly represent the public interest. <br />Between these two extremes are those proceedings affecting some lots or parcels, one of <br />which a councilmember owns. In such situations, it is a question of fact whether the <br />councilmember should not vote. If the councilmember does not voluntarily abstain from the <br />proceedings, the City Council must decide whether the member should be disqualified—a <br />decision which is subject to review in the courts if challenged. <br />In many situations where the right to vote is questioned, an interested councilmember <br />should refrain from pa �icipating in order to avoid even the appearance of impropriety. <br />If additional clarification is necessary, please contact me to discuss the situation further. <br />