My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-02-2015 City Council Minutes
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Minutes
>
2015
>
06-02-2015 City Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2015 3:36:47 PM
Creation date
7/9/2015 3:36:46 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council Minutes <br /> June 2, 2015 <br /> Page 2 of 7 <br /> 3.9. TEMPORARY EXPANSION OF PREMISE PERMIT FOR <br /> AMERICAN LEGION <br /> 3.10. UTILITY ADJUSTMENT FOR PEQUOT LAKES DENTAL <br /> 3.11. TEMPORARY 3.2% BEER LICENSE FOR COMMUNITY ACTION <br /> COUNCIL MEMBER LOUKOTA SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION <br /> CARRIED 4-0. <br /> 4. Open Forum <br /> 5. Presentations <br /> 6.1. Planning Commission Report <br /> Dawn Bittner explained that the Planning Commission unanimously <br /> approved a conditional use permit for Sarah Hanson to operate a <br /> residential commercial cleaning service, drop-off rug cleaning service, and <br /> interior detailing of motor vehicles within the downtown mixed use zoning <br /> classification. <br /> 6.2. Ordinance Amendment Regarding Appeal Process <br /> Dawn Bittner explained that the Planning Commission is recommending <br /> an amendment to Chapter 17 of the City Code to change the timeframe to <br /> file an appeal of a decision made by the Zoning Administrator or the <br /> Planning Commission. The proposed amendment would require an appeal <br /> to be filed with the City Clerk within 15 days of the decision and the appeal <br /> would be heard by either the Planning Commission or City Council within <br /> 30 days of the original action. <br /> COUNCIL MEMBER AKERSON MOVED TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE <br /> AMENDING CHAPTER 17 OF THE CITY CODE REGARDING <br /> APPEALS PROCESS. COUNCIL MEMBER LOUKOTA SECONDED <br /> THE MOTION. <br /> Council Member Akerson questioned whether the timeframe allowed in <br /> the ordinance would be enough if the person making the appeal was <br /> required to provide some type of documentation. He noted that there may <br /> be instances when the appealer must provide a survey, legal documents, <br /> or other types of documentation that takes some time to acquire. He <br /> questioned if there is a provision in the ordinance for a time extension. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.