My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09.02 - Utility Rate Study Proposals
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2012
>
02-08-2012 Council Meeting
>
09.02 - Utility Rate Study Proposals
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2013 2:57:04 PM
Creation date
12/3/2013 1:53:48 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I <br />LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL <br />January 20, 2012 <br />Ms. Sandy Peine, City Clerk <br />City of Pequot Lakes <br />4638 County Road 11 <br />Pequot Lakes, Minnesota 56447 <br />Re: Request for Proposal to Provide Utility Rate Analysis — Water and Sewer <br />Dear Ms. Peine: <br />On behalf of Springsted Incorporated, I want to thank you for the opportunity to provide the City of Pequot <br />Lakes with our proposal to provide a Utility Rate Analysis for the City's water and sewer systems. <br />Although Springsted has not had the opportunity to formally work with the City in the past, we want to <br />ensure you that we are fully committed to partnering with you to achieve all of your objectives as a city. To <br />demonstrate our commitment to acquiring a detailed working knowledge of the financial condition of the <br />City's Water and Sewer Funds, accompanying the proposal in Appendix I is a Financial Management <br />Analysis report that focuses on key indicators of your Enterprise Funds, including financial health and <br />recent historical experience. <br />Also accompanying the proposal in Appendix III is an analysis of the refunding (refinancing) of the City's <br />current USDA loan (GO Bonds of 2000). The analysis currently shows that debt service related to this <br />bond could be reduced annually by an average $4,288 ($120,000 total savings) unless the City were to have <br />the bond rated, which in our opinion, would significantly and positively impact your savings. The savings <br />estimated are inclusive of all costs of issuance so there would be no out of pocket expenses to the City for <br />the refunding. Any savings achieved impact the results of the utility rate analysis, therefore we would <br />propose that we be retained to proceed with the refunding in conjunction with the rate study providing the <br />most current, up to date and positive overall results for the City. <br />As you review the contents of our proposal, we want to emphasize Springsted's responsibilities to the City. <br />Our hallmark is to provide timely, high - quality and clear products and services to assist staff and elected <br />officials in making informed decisions. <br />Public Sector Advisors <br />Springsted Incorporated <br />380 Jackson Street, Suite 300 <br />Springsted Saint Paul, MN 55101 -4705 <br />Tel: 651-223-3000 <br />Fax:651- 223 -3002 <br />www.springsted.com <br />LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL <br />January 20, 2012 <br />Ms. Sandy Peine, City Clerk <br />City of Pequot Lakes <br />4638 County Road 11 <br />Pequot Lakes, Minnesota 56447 <br />Re: Request for Proposal to Provide Utility Rate Analysis — Water and Sewer <br />Dear Ms. Peine: <br />On behalf of Springsted Incorporated, I want to thank you for the opportunity to provide the City of Pequot <br />Lakes with our proposal to provide a Utility Rate Analysis for the City's water and sewer systems. <br />Although Springsted has not had the opportunity to formally work with the City in the past, we want to <br />ensure you that we are fully committed to partnering with you to achieve all of your objectives as a city. To <br />demonstrate our commitment to acquiring a detailed working knowledge of the financial condition of the <br />City's Water and Sewer Funds, accompanying the proposal in Appendix I is a Financial Management <br />Analysis report that focuses on key indicators of your Enterprise Funds, including financial health and <br />recent historical experience. <br />Also accompanying the proposal in Appendix III is an analysis of the refunding (refinancing) of the City's <br />current USDA loan (GO Bonds of 2000). The analysis currently shows that debt service related to this <br />bond could be reduced annually by an average $4,288 ($120,000 total savings) unless the City were to have <br />the bond rated, which in our opinion, would significantly and positively impact your savings. The savings <br />estimated are inclusive of all costs of issuance so there would be no out of pocket expenses to the City for <br />the refunding. Any savings achieved impact the results of the utility rate analysis, therefore we would <br />propose that we be retained to proceed with the refunding in conjunction with the rate study providing the <br />most current, up to date and positive overall results for the City. <br />As you review the contents of our proposal, we want to emphasize Springsted's responsibilities to the City. <br />Our hallmark is to provide timely, high - quality and clear products and services to assist staff and elected <br />officials in making informed decisions. <br />Public Sector Advisors <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.