Laserfiche WebLink
property owner via his Realtor asked for a second opinion from the Planning <br />Commission. The owner will need to make a formal appeal. <br />Auto body and auto repair are similar. Mr. Marohn explained the Letter of Agreement <br />protecting the historic activities happening there. Used car sales is a new use, not <br />allowed. New buyers could continue uses listed in the Letter of Agreement. There is no <br />compelling reason to allow used auto sales. <br />OLD BUSINESS: <br />a. Building Code Enforcement (continuation): <br />Bittner indicated that she had not collected the regl <br />Commission stated that this is not a priority and will <br />completes it. <br />b. CSAH 11 Corridor Study (continuationAnot <br />The Planning Commission had previously <br />County. The proposed improvements were <br />submitted by the County. Once the new highway <br />highway will become City roadway. %��M <br />in j <br />on the County proposals. <br />The Planning Commission does feel it <br />corridor should look like, ateway tc <br />with the City Enginee le, and <br />Comprehensive Pl <br />c. Non - Conforming <br />Mr. Maroh ai� <br />did <br />Mr. Marohn <br />conforming to Sl <br />what the State p <br />Ordinance. If we <br />The Planning <br />.ion when she <br />)osals su d by the <br />lot Lakes t proposals <br />the portion west of the <br />chooses not to comment <br />beA discussions on what the <br />Kas suggested we open dialog <br />outcome can be affected by the <br />ll11WAmendment was sent back from the City <br />fission can review it and send it back. The Mayor <br />tuncil Member Ryan had requested information <br />information was sent to him. <br />th we could repeal the whole section, and then it would be <br />A Our Ordinance created an exception; it is more lenient than <br />he City had to get a waiver from the DNR to create our <br />this section, we go back to what is included in State Statutes. <br />Chairman Pederson stated the tiered language allowed larger additions further back than <br />those closer to the lake. The City Council stated it looked confusing and added <br />complexity. The value would have been worth the time spent doing the math. <br />Council Member Akerson suggested eliminating anything less than the 50% setback. Mr. <br />Marohn explained that that would be more restrictive than our existing Ordinance, but a <br />viable option. <br />MINUTES <br />Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br />December 15, 2011 <br />7 <br />