My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09.03 - Request to Petition for Improvements to North Sluetter Road
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2015
>
05-05-2015 Council Meeting
>
09.03 - Request to Petition for Improvements to North Sluetter Road
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2015 8:22:00 AM
Creation date
4/30/2015 8:21:56 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
RELEVANT LINKS: <br /> City of Brainerd v.Brainerd The Minnesota Supreme Court finds that the state may be an"owner" for <br /> Investments Partnership, <br /> (Minn.2013). purposes of this 35 percent petition. (The Court finds the statute <br /> A.G.Op.387-B-10(June 29, unambiguous and refuses to consider extrinsic evidence by looking at three <br /> 1954).A.G.Op.408-C Attorney General Opinions. These Opinions suggested that neither the state <br /> (October 28,1954). nor the city is an"owner" for purposes of this 35 percent petition.) <br /> If the council relies upon the petition as its basis for proceeding, it cannot <br /> make a substantial change in the nature of the improvement from that asked <br /> for in the petition. For example, it may not order an improvement for water <br /> and sewer when the petition has asked for water alone, or add curb and <br /> gutter to a petition for blacktop. <br /> See Form 1(Petition for o In some cases, for example buried utility lines, 100 percent of landowners <br /> Local Improvement -100% <br /> of property owners). must petition for an improvement. <br /> Minn.Stat.§429.035. The council must pass and publish a resolution determining whether the <br /> See Form 4. <br /> Minn.Stat.§429.036. petition is legally sufficient or not. Any person directly affected by the <br /> resolution may challenge the council's determination (as to the legal <br /> sufficiency of the petition) in district court. The appeal must be made within <br /> 30 days and include a bond of$250. <br /> 2. By council <br /> Minn.Stat.§429.031,subd. The council certainly may act on its own initiative in proposing a local <br /> 1(0. <br /> See Form 4-A. improvement and ordering a feasibility report. As a practical note, an <br /> See Section II-D-1: Voting extraordinary majority vote from the council is not necessar to initiate the <br /> requirements for ordering the <br /> improvement. proceedings. (Later in the process, a will be required <br /> to pass the resolution ordering an improvement initiated by council). The <br /> council must calculate the cost of the improvement or direct staff to do so. <br /> B. Feasibility report <br /> Minn.Stat.§429.031,subd. Whether initiated by petition or by council, Chapter 429 requires that the <br /> 1(b). <br /> city engineer, or another person with similar skills, prepare what is <br /> commonly called a"feasibility report." (Bond attorneys require a certified <br /> copy of a feasibility report before issuing bonds to finance a local <br /> Minn.Stat.§429.031,subd. improvement.) The feasibilit re ort must cover such factors as whether the <br /> 1(d). <br /> project is necessary, <br /> See Form 5. of the cost, an estimate of that cost, whether the improvement is <br /> cost effective, and any other information necessary for council <br /> consideration. <br /> Information Memo: <br /> Page 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.