My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.2 Zoning Administrator's Report
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2024
>
04-01-2024
>
6.2 Zoning Administrator's Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2024 8:25:04 AM
Creation date
3/29/2024 8:21:59 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Minutes <br />March 25, 2024 <br />Page 7 of 8 <br />----------------------------- <br /> <br /> <br />COMMISSION MEMBER GONCZY MOVED TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC <br />HEARING. COMMISSION MEMBER JOHNSON SECONDED THE MOTION. <br />MOTION CARRIED 6-0. <br /> <br />Public Hearing closed at 7:21 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />4. Open Forum <br /> <br />Community member/resident, Andrew Allison had a question on the Maikke <br />variance approval. How much are they able to raise the property up, he’s worried <br />about the standing water and flooding. If he raises the property by bringing in fill <br />and it then encroaches and water gets into the shop on Andrew’s property, <br />potentially ruining the exterior of or things inside the garage, who’s responsible <br />for that. The shop on Andrew’s property was put up before he purchased it, in <br />Travis Maikke having a survey done, it appears Andrew’s shop is closer to the <br />property line than thought, what does this mean/look like. Burslie stated the <br />drainage has been as such for many years, its known as the natural or existing <br />drainage patterns. The applicant needs to manage onsite; they’re not allowed to <br />put in a bunch of impervious and then drain the water to a different property, they <br />need to manage it on their own property. Burslie stated the city doesn’t have <br />provisions in this particular zone as we do in Shoreline Residential etc. This is <br />private property, the homeowner can cut the trees to get his home on the <br />property. It was stated for Andrew to connect with Travis as a neighborly gesture <br />and work through things in that manner. <br /> <br />5. New Business <br /> <br />Commission E.Larson would like for the Planning Commission to address the <br />current Ordinance requirements regarding the square footage with guest <br />cottages in all residential areas noted, ensuring that they’re alike and uniform, as <br />much as possible. <br /> <br />COMMISSION MEMBER E.LARSON MOVED TO INITIATE AN ORDINANCE <br />AMENDMENT TO MODIFY THE MAXIMUM SIZE FOR GUEST COTTAGES, <br />COMMISSION MEMBER JOHNSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION <br />CARRIED 6-0. <br /> <br />6. Old Business <br /> <br /> Nothing at this time. <br /> <br />7. Approval of Minutes <br /> <br /> COMMISSION MEMBER GONCZY MOVED TO ACCEPT/APPROVE <br />FEBRUARY 26, 2024 MINUTES AS IS. COMMISSION MEMBER JOHNSON <br />SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 6-0. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.