My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.2 Zoning Administrator's Report
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2024
>
04-01-2024
>
6.2 Zoning Administrator's Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2024 8:25:04 AM
Creation date
3/29/2024 8:21:59 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Minutes <br />March 25, 2024 <br />Page 4 of 8 <br />----------------------------- <br /> <br /> <br />3.2 PLAID LLC: Rezone request for 11.09 acres from Forest Management to <br />Commercial: PID 29110540. <br /> <br />Burslie went through the request/application. Same process of the meeting as <br />Variance, the difference is this Rezone is a recommendation from the Planning <br />Commission to the City Council. Justin stated this property does not have city <br />sewer water at this time. This parcel touches six other properties. Surrounding <br />properties have a variety of zoning: Transition Residential, Rural Residential, <br />Agriculture, Commercial and Forest Management. Staff findings are provided for <br />both approval and denial. We look at the Comprehensive Plan here, which does <br />conflict with the Future Development Plan. It was asked for all maps to be <br />reviewed, including the Land Use Matrix, which shows all types of businesses <br />that are allowed in the Commercial area. <br /> <br />No questions from the Commission currently for Burslie. It was then opened for <br />public comment. <br /> <br />Property owner next to proposed rezone area, Lisa Urseth: She talked about the <br />Comprehensive Plan and how on each page it states the city will preserve the <br />natural features of Pequot Lakes. Also read a page in which it stated ‘the rural <br />area of what was once Sibley Township (that’s us), features low density <br />residential development…” – everything she’s reading is against the <br />comprehensive plan if this rezone is approved. You’d have to rewrite the 32-page <br />document. The purchasers knew it was Forest Management when they <br />purchased it, now they want it rezoned. Everything about the developer’s plan <br />keeps people out of our small town, they’re not bringing in business, they’ll all <br />stop in and bypass us. The trees on the property now are a barrier from her <br />home to 371. The properties now that are zoned commercial aren’t next to <br />homes, the property you’re looking to rezone is right next to homes, keep it as it <br />is. <br /> <br />Craig Nagel, long term Pequot resident and was on Township Planning and <br />Zoning and Council many years ago. He worked very hard with citizens to keep <br />Pequot Lakes rural and not city like, they wanted to keep it green and safe. This <br />will become uncontrollable with what is able to be put on this parcel if rezoned to <br />commercial. Urges the Commission to deny the request as this is not what the <br />citizens want, nor those that live next to the property – you’ll erase the history <br />and all the work that was done from those before you. <br /> <br />David Kennedy, family has neighboring property now, grew up in the area. He <br />went through the history of the neighboring properties and how some of it came <br />to be rezoned as commercial – likely when it was part of the township, before the <br />highway was constructed where it is today. One of the homeowners from the 70’s <br />had a business on this farming property – nobody could imagine zoning that <br />commercial then would lead us to where we are today. He was under the <br />impression that the Comprehensive Plan was to keep that area undeveloped. <br />Nothing we can do with the current zone of commercial, but we can stop the lot <br />currently as FM from going to Commercial. Finding of Facts, he disagrees with
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.