My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05.01 - City Audit
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2015
>
05-05-2015 Council Meeting
>
05.01 - City Audit
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2015 3:43:13 PM
Creation date
4/29/2015 3:43:08 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council <br /> • City of Pequot Lakes <br /> Page 3 <br /> Other audit findings or issues <br /> The following describes findings or issues arising from the audit that are, in our professional judgment, <br /> significant and relevant to your oversight of the financial reporting process: <br /> • Limited Segregation of Duties—The City has limited employees with primary responsibility for all of the <br /> accounting and financial duties and receipting of utility billings. As a result, many of those aspects of <br /> internal accounting control which rely upon an adequate segregation of duties are, for all practical <br /> purposes, not available in this staffing scenario. We recognize that the City's cost/benefit analysis has <br /> concluded the employment of additional persons for the purpose of segregating duties is not practicable <br /> from a financial standpoint, but we are required, under our professional responsibilities, to call the <br /> situation to your attention. The City should continue to utilize the City Council's oversight of the <br /> budgeting, cash reconciling, and receipts and disbursements process to the maximum extent possible to <br /> mitigate the absence of segregation of duties. This condition increases the possibility that errors or <br /> irregularities may occur and not be detected on a timely basis. <br /> • Oversight of the Financial Reporting Process — Management is responsible for establishing and <br /> maintaining internal controls for the fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations, <br /> cash flows, and disclosures in the financial statements, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted <br /> accounting principles (GAAP). The City does not have a system of internal controls that would enable <br /> management to conclude the financial statements and related disclosures are complete and presented <br /> in accordance with GAAP. As such, management requested us to prepare a draft of the financial <br /> statements, including the related footnote disclosures. The outsourcing of these services is not unusual <br /> in organization of your size and is a result of management's cost/benefit decision to rely on our <br /> accounting expertise rather than incurring this internal resource cost. The design of internal controls <br /> over the financial reporting process affects the ability of the organization to report their financial data <br /> consistently with the assertions of management in the financial statements. <br /> We understand this material weakness is already known to management and represents a conscious <br /> decision by management and the City Council as a result of cost or other considerations. We <br /> acknowledge management is responsible for making decisions concerning costs and the related <br /> benefits. We are responsible to communicate significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in <br /> accordance with professional standards regardless of management's decisions to ensure that the City <br /> Council is aware of this situation. <br /> Other information in documents containing audited financial statements <br /> With respect to the required supplementary information (RSI) accompanying the financial statements,we made <br /> certain inquiries of management about the methods of preparing the RSI, including whether the RSI has been <br /> measured and presented in accordance with prescribed guidelines, whether the methods of measurement and <br /> preparation have been changed from the prior period and the reasons for any such changes, and whether there <br /> were any significant assumptions or interpretations underlying the measurement or presentation of the RSI. We <br /> compared the RSI for consistency with management's responses to the foregoing inquiries, the basic financial <br /> statements, and other knowledge obtained during the audit of the basic financial statements. Because these <br /> limited procedures do not provide sufficient evidence, we did not express an opinion or provide any assurance <br /> on the RSI. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.