Laserfiche WebLink
EDC Minutes — Special Meeting <br />December 12, 2023 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />tax base. <br />Commission Lelwica stated, if we hire a realtor, then what? Can we interview <br />them first and see what they would do with the lots? <br />Chair Lottman stated we have a potential builder with a proposal — purchase a few <br />lots, build and sell at the $199-$229k range with single car garage. Commission <br />Lelwica would like to see some covenants in the development to be attractive — <br />single car garage homes not as easy to sell. We need a certain level of stock in <br />town for people to live here vs. the next town over. <br />Commission Hallan asked what's best — giving a rebate or an incentive? We're a <br />city, utilities is our business — why would we give that for free? Rebate/incentive if <br />you complete the project in 24 mths as an example. What about RFP? Roads are <br />currently ok at best in this development — is the city willing to resurface it to make <br />it better — to help entice the sale of the properties? Could be a selling point... <br />Commission Lelwica asked if the city is set on the current size of the lots as <br />platted. They might not be big enough for 2-car garages? They differ now than the <br />original. Liaison SPederson stated the city could be open to new ideas if a <br />developer came in with ideas, but the city is not re -platting. <br />Commission Holley asked if we're ok with townhomes going in the current <br />development as proposed by current contractor interested? Commission Hallan <br />stated to get this in the hands of the realtors and see what they say, we can then <br />go back to P&Z if needed for any updates and still meet the setbacks etc. Holley <br />stressed that we cannot agree to 1 car garage homes, they just don't sell. Lelwica <br />agreed and stated if we allow a 1 car garage, that is where all the `extra' outside <br />storage items start to come into play (fish houses, trailers etc), need 2 car garage <br />to be competitive. <br />Lottman asked if the EDC is giving a recommendation to help the city and get 2-3 <br />brokers/realtors here to help with the marketing/selling of the properties. Holley <br />stated we need to give them the basics and details of what can be done vs. not on <br />the property — the realtor will take it from there to get it marketed properly. She <br />also noted there's no `set' fee for any realtor, it's an agreed upon amount. She <br />stated this area could be both duplex or single family homes — there's options. <br />She'd like to have local real estate community have access to this (she's also <br />disqualifying herself from this process). Commission Lelwica asked if we look to <br />sell a few properties or all. Holley said if we're moving on this project, let's move <br />and sell them all, do it right. Lottman said lets get the realtors involved, we've <br />spent enough money on this project — get them involved and see what they say. <br />Attendance member, Jon Lubke asked who sets the price for property? Lottman <br />stated the realtor will help with this. Tyler Glynn (virtual attendee) asked what the <br />downside is? Holley sated 'none', just stressed again to work with realtors in <br />Pequot so they're more invested. <br />Commission Hallan made a motion for the EDC to make a meeting date for <br />broker/realtor to RFP & how it should be structured — general meeting or 2 <br />committee members? Lelwica stated she'd like to have it known in advance of the <br />general meeting date and 2-member committee date. Lottman stated to have it on <br />the January agenda for all to meet, have a Special session right after that meeting <br />is adjourned, same night. <br />COMMISSION HALLAN MADE A MOTION TO HOLD DISCUSSIONS WITH <br />FURTURE BROKERS W/RFP WHERE ALL INTERSTED PARTIES CAN ATTEND, AT <br />