My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-12-2014 Park Board Minutes
Laserfiche
>
Parks
>
Minutes
>
2014
>
06-12-2014 Park Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/20/2015 8:45:57 AM
Creation date
4/20/2015 8:45:53 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Park Board Minutes <br />Jwte 12,2014 <br />Page2 <br />Mike Loven reminded the Commissioners that a restroom at Trailside Park is a <br />priority for 2015. He explained that he has included $40,000 in the 2o1s <br />preliminary budget for two bathrooms; one male and one female. He explained <br />that the bathrooms would be seasonal and not heated. <br />7. Mavo Lake Open House <br />The Commissioners discussed details for the open house at Mayo Lake Park <br />Preserve. <br />Date: September 27th <br />Time: 12:00 p.m. - 3:00 p.m <br />The Commission members suggested that Nancy Vogt write an article on the <br />open house one week prior to the event. Míke Loven stated he would have <br />directional signage for attendees. Chair Malecha stated she would be organize <br />the food - hot dogs, chips and soda. <br />8. Other Business <br />Brenda Myers discussed the possibility of a regional recreational area and nature <br />explore conservancy in Pequot Lakes. She explained there is a community group <br />that is making application with the University of MN Extension and Regional <br />Sustainable Development Partnerships to develop a master plan for the park. <br />She stated she was considering some Potlatch Land located near Cloverleaf <br />Lake and the Lowell Wildlife Management area, but there is currently a purchase <br />agreement on the land. She questioned whether the Park Commission felt this <br />type of a project would be an asset to the Cíty. The Commission had questions <br />regarding the cost to the City, maintenance responsibilities of the park, and the <br />fact that there currently is no specific parcel of land available. Ms. Myers stated <br />that they could do the study with the idea that a different piece of land could <br />become available. <br />Commissioner Bruch stated that he would endorse the concept but the City has <br />no funds to contribute. Ms. Myers stated that she would stay in contact with <br />Commissioner Bruch. <br />9. Adjournment <br />There being no further business, COMMISSIONER BRUCH MOVED TO <br />ADJOURN THE MEETING. COMMISSIONER ETTESVOLD SECONDED THE <br />MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 4-0. <br />The meeting adjourned at 4:45 p.m <br />Respectfully submitted,
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.