Laserfiche WebLink
City <br /> Pett ? AGENDA ITEM #5 <br /> Lakes <br /> REPORT TO <br /> CITY COUNCIL <br /> Report Prepared by: WSN <br /> Date: April 21, 2015 <br /> Subject: Trailside Park Restrooms <br /> Report: Attached are two possible options for review and <br /> discussion based on the discussion by the council at <br /> Tuesday night's (April 7th) meeting. They are both the <br /> same in size and shape. The difference between the two are <br /> the material selections. As you will see noted on Option <br /> "A" the upper portion of the building would be the <br /> burnished CMU and the lower portion simulated stone. <br /> Option "B" the upper portion again would be the burnished <br /> CMU, but the lower portion would be a split face CMU <br /> adding some texture. On option "B" the split face CMU <br /> cost wise would be similar to the burnished CMU and <br /> therefore the only additional construction costs on this <br /> option would be the decorative brackets. I have contacted <br /> the manufacturer of the anti-graffiti coating and it looks as <br /> though this coating can also be applied to either the split <br /> face CMU or the simulated stone as well. The decorative <br /> brackets I have noted as painted metal in lieu of timber <br />