My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06.01 - Planning Commission Report
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2015
>
02-03-2015 Council Meeting
>
06.01 - Planning Commission Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2015 12:39:48 PM
Creation date
1/29/2015 12:39:47 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
When asked, Mr. Marohn explained the accessory structures do not need to be moved as <br /> they exist today; they remain nonconforming. You can lessen a nonconformity, which <br /> this does. <br /> A motion was made by Planning Commission Member Habein, seconded by <br /> Planning Commission Member Wilson, to approve the metes and bounds <br /> subdivision,based on the following Findings of Fact: <br /> 1. The subject properties are properly zoned"Rural sidential . <br /> 2. The lot widths of the proposed parcels meet the i imum standard of 200 feet. <br /> 3. The proposed parcels meet the minimum area <br /> requirements of the Rural <br /> Residential zone. <br /> 4. The "Adams Tract" currently contains a non-confor , dwelling and a non- <br /> conforming accessory structure. f.<subdivision does increase the level of <br /> non-conformity. <br /> 5. The"Hendrickson Tract"currently conas' a no',conforming dwelling and a non- <br /> conforming accessory structure. The s does not increase level of <br /> non-conformity. <br /> 6. The subject properties are not adjacent to teF unicipal water and wastewater <br /> utilities. All three parcels contain a privAte sewer stem and a private water well. <br /> 7. The properties are suitable in thin natural }te for the tended purpose and these <br /> lot splits would'ri harmful tfo`hhe he. 4 , ty, o welfare of future residents <br /> or of the community. f <br /> 8. The applican are not proposing a iovisions for water-based recreation. <br /> 9. The proposed fotlayout meets the re. ements of the ordinance. <br /> 10.Th •1/.•sed side` s Hogg ire at right ngles to the existing road line and the <br /> v4-8 , ;€nJf the adjacent pro „ <br /> 11; of the pr sed parcels has at l �`l ` 33-feet of frontage on public right-of-way. <br /> 12. % subject property m the requirements of the code for stromwater <br /> man ement. <br /> 13. Theresa no public streets proposed within the development. <br /> 14. The proposed subdivision would bring the existing dwellings on the"Adams Tract" <br /> and the "Irickson Track" into conformity so they are not encroaching on the <br /> side yard setback, <br /> All members voted"aye". Motion carried. <br /> b. Preserve Golf Course Wetland Fill <br /> Zoning Administrator Bittner explained the SWCD is the Local Government Unit for the <br /> City; the City is invited as a courtesy. Initially, the Preserve requested 15,000 to 20,000 <br /> square feet of fill on Hole #5. They have now proposed to fill 10,000 square feet to allow <br /> for easier play for women and junior golfers. <br /> MINUTES 4 <br /> Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br /> January 15, 2015 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.