My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11 - City Clerk
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2013
>
03-05-2013 Council Meeting
>
11 - City Clerk
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/27/2013 3:42:47 PM
Creation date
11/27/2013 2:41:05 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Economic Development Commission Minutes <br />February 19, 2013 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />Jenna Crawford gave an update on Chamber events. <br />March Aeenda Items <br />• Urban and Rural Taxing Districts <br />Other Business <br />Discussion was held regarding the request from Loneso ttage to restructure <br />the loan to the City. The City Clerk explained the fol ng: <br />1. The City entered into a TIF Developmen gree with Lonesome <br />Cottage for $146,000. TIF increments are pa' t vell&wice a year. <br />2. Lonesome Cottage purchased 6 cres f the City's ifIFAWrW park, <br />which equals the tax increment amo <br />3. The city entered into a loan agreement Lonesome Cottage for <br />$100,000 to be paid on January 2" in five installfiients <br />4. The developer is receiving about $23,500 per year in tax increment and <br />owes the City $24,833 per year for.loan repayment;.` <br />5. The t nei en' will continue through 52017. The Note to the City will <br />be paid of�ih02014. <br />6. The developer is requesting to restructure the loan to allow monthly <br />/:- payments to the City for the balance of the loan for 60 months. <br />The EDC discus h*EC cons of working with Lonesome Cottage to <br />restructure the loa lt it would be best to work with the business as it <br />is a viable employer i the City. It was noted that the payments should be tied to <br />the TIF payments. It,ivas also suggested that the payments be extended to 3 to 4 <br />years rather than S years. The EDC suggested reviewing a financial statement <br />prior to restructuring the loan. <br />COMMISSIONER ROGGENKAMP MOVED TO RECOMMEND THAT <br />THE COUNCIL SUPPORT THE RESTRUCTURING OF THE LOAN <br />CONTINGENT ON REVIEW OF A FINANCIAL STATEMENT. <br />COMMISSIONER MERRIT SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION <br />CARRIED 4 -0. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.