Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Minutes <br />January 3, 2012 <br />Page 4 of 11 <br />EXPANSION /REPLACEMENT OF NON - CONFORMING STRUCTURES. <br />COUNCIL MEMBER SJOBLAD SECONDED THE MOTION. <br />COUNCIL MEMBER RYAN MOVED TO TABLE THE MOTION UNTIL <br />THE VOTE REQUIREMENT IS STATED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY FOR <br />THIS MOTION.COUNCIL MEMBER AKERSON SECONDED THE <br />MOTION. MOTION FAILED 2 -3. COUNCIL MEMBERS SJOBLAD, <br />MALECHA, AND MAYOR ADAMS VOTED AGAINST THE MOTION. <br />COUNCIL MEMBERS RYAN AND AKERSON VOTED IN FAVOR OF <br />THE MOTION. <br />Council Member Ryan expressed concerns with the ordinance in that it is <br />more complex and requires a building inspector to inspect the home prior <br />to building. <br />Council Members Malecha and Sjoblad stated that they were in <br />agreement with the proposed ordinance. Mayor Adams stated that she <br />also agrees with the ordinance but would like to change D back to the <br />previous requirements. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE ON THE ORIGINAL MOTION: COUNCIL MEMBER <br />AKERSON NAY; COUNCIL MEMBER MALECHA AYE; COUNCIL <br />MEMBER RYAN NAY; COUNCIL MEMBER SJOBLAD AYE; MAYOR <br />ADAMS NAY. MOTION FAILED 2 -3. <br />Mayor Adams stated that she would like the Planning Commission to <br />reconsider the ordinance as it stands with the revision of reverting D to the <br />language in the existing ordinance. The Mayor requested that this item be <br />placed on the February City Council agenda. <br />6.2. Planninq Services Proposal for 2012 <br />MAYOR ADAMS MOVED TO ACCEPT THE 2012 PLANNING <br />SERVICES CONTRACT WITH COMMUNITY GROWTH INSTITUTE AT <br />LEVEL 1 TO INCLUDE QUALITY PERMITTING. COUNCIL MEMBER <br />SJOBLAD SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION PASSED 3 -2. <br />COUNCIL MEBMERS AKERSON AND RYAN OPPOSED. <br />Planning Commission Chair Scott Pederson spoke to the Council <br />regarding the comprehensive plan. He noted that the Planning <br />Commission would like to know what it is in the plan that the Council <br />disagrees with. Chair Pederson reviewed some highlights in the proposed <br />comp plan noting that the plan would adopt new street standards, adjust <br />land use regulations giving more flexibility for rural and urban property <br />