29220574 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

i 3. The proposed rezoning to Shoreline Residential meets the compatibility requirements in that the properties are adjacent to the Water Resource zone; the compatibility requirements state that the zone should extend through the first tier of parcels to a public road or 500 feet from the OHW, whichever is closer to the water body. In this case, the public road, Front Street, is the nearest public road which is roughly 500 feet from the OHW. 4. The subject property meets the purpose and intent of the Shoreline Residential district to provide a district for riparian residential development. 5. The property meets the minimum lot size requirement of 20,000 square feet for the Shoreline Residential zone, being nearly 10 acres in size, with roughly 3 acres falling within the proposed Shoreline Residential zone. 6. The property meets the minimum lot width standar•.100 feet for the Shoreline Residential zone, being more than 200 feet wide. 7. Rezoning a portion of the property adjacent to S?e Higiiu 371 to Commercial would not be compatible with the Future LA,. e map designates this area as future Rural Residential in charact _ . 8. A rezoning of the portion of the prpe along the Highway mmercial would be compatible with the surroundin. s 'n• sifications as e adjoining properties to the north and south are curren yo edCommercial and have been developed as such. 9. Rezoning the eastern portion compatibility requirements for would serve as a buffer be surrounding residential districts. 10. Rezoning the a a'• ortion of constitute s and prope boundary of the the 1aa ont se properties ommercial would meet the ercial dis the subject properties intensj commercial areas and ese prope es to Commercial would not adjoining operties are currently zoned Commercial ide of the H ay are also Commercial. The western 'alp sroperty 'a line between the eastern boundary of rn boundary of the lot to the south of the ropertie°° entirely to Shoreline Residential would constitute e propes were previously zoned Commercial along State y 371. The`aty has sought to avoid down -zoning unless requested by the wner. All members voted e.'' Motion carried. APPLICANT: Brian Pahl. Applicant requests Preliminary Plat of Mayo Acres. Applicant was represented by Kris Wroolie of Kramer, Leas, Deleo. Mr. Marohn explained the Staff Report and that the applicant is aware of the Park Dedication Fee. Finding of Fact No. 12 states where the driveway should be located in Lot One and should be included as a Condition. The Planning Commission discussed whether our Ordinance is handicapping a better design. There are four accesses onto the road, rather Planning Commission Minutes 2 December 14, 2006