My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10.03 - Trailside Estates
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2008
>
03-03-2008 Council Meeting
>
10.03 - Trailside Estates
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/18/2014 3:36:01 PM
Creation date
9/18/2014 3:26:45 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
DELIN <br /> `" LAW OFFICE <br /> ATTORNEYS AT LAW <br /> 30849 FIRST STREET <br /> PAUL J.SANDELIN P.O.Box 298 TELEPHONE(218)568-8481 <br /> STACY M.JOHNSON PEQUOT LAKES,MINNESOTA 56472 FAx(218)568-8444 <br /> www lakesarealaw com <br /> February 18, 2008 <br /> VIA FACSIMILE 405-749-6800 COPY <br /> Granite RE, Inc. FAX SENT <br /> Attn: Brad Tollefson <br /> 14001 Quailbrook Drive <br /> Oklahoma City, OK 73134 - <br /> Re: Trailside Estates Development LLLP <br /> Pequot Lakes, Minnesota <br /> Our File No. 25000.047 <br /> Dear Mr. Tollefson: <br /> I am in receipt of your letter dated February 15, 2008. For your information a representative <br /> from Pate Bonding Company in Minneapolis contacted me regarding this matter approximately <br /> 10 days ago. I believe they may be the agent in Minnesota that assisted with the issuance of the <br /> bond. Rather than addressing this matter with multiple parties perhaps the two of you could <br /> coordinate one response. <br /> I discussed my letter with the agent from Pate Bonding Company and explained the problem with <br /> the maintenance bond is that it is the incorrect type of bond required by the Development <br /> Agreement. The Pate Bonding Company agent was very helpful and indicated that the principal <br /> refused to sign a performance bond, which would replace the maintenance bond so it appears that <br /> the principal has made a decision to not cooperate with the City and cure the default under the <br /> Development Agreement. I requested a letter from Pate Bonding Company memorializing the <br /> fact that the principal refuses to cooperate with the issuance of a performance bond as required <br /> by the Development Agreement. To date I have not received that letter. You refer to the deadline <br /> of February 15, 2008 as a self-imposed deadline, in other words a deadline perhaps to be ignored. <br /> To be very clear, that is a deadline required by the City and the principal has been notified of that <br /> deadline. Whether or not the principal cures the default outlined in my letter is up to the <br /> principal. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.