My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06.02 - Downtown Plan
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2008
>
03-03-2008 Council Meeting
>
06.02 - Downtown Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2014 3:57:51 PM
Creation date
9/17/2014 3:57:49 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Miller asked how many storage units the Planning Commission would like to see. <br /> �-- Could there by an option to increase the number in the future? Could they make it an <br /> outlot and later do a supplemental plat? <br /> The Planning Commission would like to see a buffer from neighboring properties, set <br /> backs increased and additional screening. <br /> Mr. Miller asked where he should go with the number of beaches. Mr. Marohn stated the <br /> City has jurisdiction above the OHW and the DNR has jurisdiction below the OHW. <br /> Mrs. Beaver stated that the east side of the point is questionable to the lake bottom. <br /> It is not a natural beach. Mr. Miller stated he will get the co m*s •m the DNR and <br /> the docks for the next meeting. <br /> Mrs. Beaver stated she likes the lodge and pool. It wij. t 'Se press.4 K.,•ff the beach. She <br /> would prefer to see the existing beach enlarged. T : xe and Rule' , our Ordinance <br /> state that a beach and docks should be centralizes er real concerns beach and <br /> the runoff from the tar road down to the beach n <br /> (Chairman Woog moved to item 6.c. Official Road 1$ p d ate as Mr. Miller is in <br /> attendance to discuss this also) <br /> b. Conservation Subdivision Design <br /> Mr. Marohn explained the Staff Report. S is 1 <br /> would eplace Section 8.1 and <br /> Section 5 would be amens ed. e <br /> The next di" , � n w •®a#elude where it applies, the <br /> underlying density and; thy: ere a defau f option or tiot. The Planning Commission <br /> was comfortable e lang ,e. Final Pla:. d the Rezone to Open Space should be <br /> combined to save im s• reduce fees. Staff ,directed to come back with additional <br /> material. ' <br /> c. Offie da� <br /> Mr. .hn stated a le • ddres ;, • teethe Planning Commission had been received late <br /> this aft‘ <br /> •n by the Ci :m the ity Attorney. Copies have been given to each <br /> member ening. Mr , ande m stated that the first step would be for the Planning <br /> Commission a \•opt a"m\r thoroughfare plan" and a"community facilities plan". <br /> The second step • a ld be •opting a proposed official map. The third step would be for <br /> the City Council to° dlct a public hearing and adopt an ordinance adopting the official <br /> map. Mr. Marohn stj-d that Staff will provide something formal to review next month. <br /> a <br /> (Chairman Woog moved to item 6.e. Staff Interpretation: Access Requirement as the <br /> property owner and his representative were in the audience.) <br /> d. Ordinance Amendment, Signs in City Parks: <br /> Mr. Marohn explained that the Park Board would like to place name signs to identify the <br /> various City Parks. The Mayor would also like additional language allowing use of <br /> Minutes 6 <br /> Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br /> February 21, 2008 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.