06.02 - Downtown Plan - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

16. The manufacturing of the utility buildings will be conducted inside the storage building to prevent any offensive odor, fumes, dust, noise, and vibration. There will be no additional lighting or signs to disturb neighboring properties. 17. The proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of natural, scenic, or historical features of major significance. 18. There should not be any pollution of ground and surface waters due the proposed use. Subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall keep all production inside, all materi inside, and all utility buildings under construction inside one of the existing)6" ctures on site. 2. A maximum of ten utility buildings shall be dis. - d and provided for sale during the transient use events currently permitt 4:y Thlity buildings shall be limited to a maximum of 200 square foot in ar y 3. The applicant shall not place additional sip ':_ . 'conjunct. 6 permit. � ermit. , ith this The granting of this permit does not con : ; te a multi-tenant sit= 4. The City may review the traffic hi 6 $‘n or F and the proiki,= within 24 months of this approval. If it is determ w s th difications t/ CR 107 are needed due to the use on this property, th• odifications would need to be completed by the owner at thaMime. All members voted"aye". Motion carry-6.% Mr. Woog closed the publi hearing. t ADDITIONS ORV TIO TO THE A NDA: New Business: �� 6. g. Econo lopm \om I mistrial Park Expansion meeting. at{ \ m�N OPEN F i ' Ann Beaver, > wa, askecwhen the appropriate time would be to comment on Wilderness Res villas "d their grading violation. Chairman Woog stated that she , could make her co" s here as the Wilderness Resort Villas discussion was not a public hearing. Mrs. Beaver stated that she attended a site visit on November 27, 2007 along with the property owner, Mr. Marohn and a Planning Commission member. The site visit was to discuss the construction of the second beach that was done without a permit. At that visit, Mr. Steffens stated that he was not aware of the conditions included in the CUP. The Resort is still advertising the use of 2 beaches. At the CUP approval, the City Council added a condition that docking be approved by the DNR for centralized docking. She wondered if the City should remind Mr. Steffens of the conditions and in regard to the new docking system, was there a time stated when it needed to be in place? Minutes 4 Pequot Lakes Planning Commission February 21, 2008