My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.4 Consider Adoption of Downtown Plan Update
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2022
>
07-05-2022 City Council Meeting
>
6.4 Consider Adoption of Downtown Plan Update
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/30/2022 3:53:15 PM
Creation date
6/30/2022 3:53:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
IV. Neighborhood Evaluation <br /> Neighborhood Composition <br /> A brief description of the land use pattern adjacent to the street in question. <br /> Utility Overview <br /> A list of municipal utilities available along the street. <br /> Street Maintenance Revenue <br /> The estimated amount of property taxes that will be collected over the next 25 years that will be <br /> dedicated to street maintenance. This is based on the city's historical approach to street maintenance <br /> spending(approximately 25%of the annual budget). <br /> Street Maintenance Cost <br /> The estimated cost to perform one significant maintenance project on the street over the next 25 years. <br /> Results are calculated on a present worth basis. <br /> Percentage of Cost Covered by Adjacent Revenue <br /> The street maintenance revenue as a percentage of the street maintenance cost. Meant to represent <br /> how much revenue the current development pattern yields as a percentage of how much the city is <br /> obligated to spend to rebuild it. <br /> Walkability Score <br /> An estimate of the ability of pedestrians to travel the corridor. In general,the ratings indicate the <br /> following: <br /> 1. Very Poor—The street presents a hostile and dangerous environment to pedestrians and <br /> cyclists. Pedestrian and biking activity would be very low. <br /> 2. Poor—The street environment is not conducive to pedestrian travel or biking.The adjacent land <br /> use pattern does not encourage walking. <br /> 3. Moderate—The street is safely passable by pedestrians and bikers, but the adjacent land use <br /> pattern detracts from the pedestrian environment. <br /> 4. Good—The street accommodates pedestrians and bikers well.The adjacent land use pattern <br /> creates an environment that is inviting to pedestrians and bikers. <br /> 5. Very Good—The street prioritizes pedestrian and biking travel, providing safety of movement <br /> and giving them the right-of-way at intersections.The adjacent land use pattern creates a strong <br /> sense of place that makes the street comfortable to those outside of a car. <br /> Redevelopment Potential <br /> An estimate of the land adjacent to the street to support additional development and/or more intensive <br /> redevelopment of existing structures. In general,the ratings indicate the following: <br /> LOW potential:The adjacent structures have a high value in comparison to the underlying land <br /> value.There is little market incentive to purchase structures along this street and either tear <br /> them down or significantly renovate them. Improvements or alterations to the street will not <br /> have a significant impact on the amount of development along the street. <br /> Pequot Lakes Downtown Plan—Updated July,2022 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.