Laserfiche WebLink
11 <br /> 3. Emergency meetings <br /> An"emergency meeting"is a special meeting called because of circumstances that,in the judgment <br /> of the public body,require immediate consideration by the public body.Posted or published notice of <br /> an emergency meeting is not required.However,the city must make a good faith effort to notify each <br /> news outlet that has filed a written request for notice.Notice must be given by telephone or any other <br /> method to notify members of the public body.The notice must include the subject of the meeting. <br /> 4. Recessed or continued meetings <br /> No additional notice is needed for a recessed or continued meeting if all of the following criteria are met: <br /> • The meeting is a recessed or continued session of a previous meeting. <br /> • The time and place of the meeting was established during the previous meeting. <br /> • The time and place of the meeting was recorded in the minutes of the previous meeting. <br /> 5. Closed meetings <br /> The same notice requirements apply to closed meetings as to open meetings.Additionally, <br /> advance notice to an individual who will be the subject of such a meeting is needed under certain <br /> circumstances(such as to employees who are the subject of performance evaluations or disciplinary <br /> proceedings). <br /> • Written materials <br /> At least one copy of the materials related to agenda items that are made available to the council at or <br /> before the meeting must also be made available for inspection by the public.However,this does not apply <br /> to not-public data or materials relating to the agenda items of a closed meeting. <br /> • Common problems in applying the law <br /> There are many situations for which the open meeting law is unclear.This section provides an overview of <br /> some of the more common situations and how the law may be applied. <br /> 1. Data practices <br /> Generally,meetings may not be closed to discuss data that is not public.However,the public body <br /> must close any part of a meeting at which certain types of not-public data are discussed(such as <br /> active law enforcement investigative data,police internal affairs data,medical records data,and <br /> certain victim,health,medical or welfare data). <br /> If not-public data is discussed at an open meeting when the meeting is required to be closed,it is <br /> a violation of the open meeting law.Discussions of some types of not-public data may also be a <br /> violation of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act(MGDPA).However,not-public data may <br /> generally be discussed at an open meeting without liability or penalty if both of the following criteria <br /> are met: <br /> • The disclosure relates to a matter within the scope of the council's authority. <br /> • The disclosure is necessary to conduct the business or agenda item before the public body. <br /> Data that is discussed at an open meeting retains its original classification under the MGDPA. <br /> However,a record of the meeting is public,regardless of the form.It is su a:ested that not-public data <br /> that is discussed at an open meeting not be specifically detailed in the minutes. <br /> 2. Executive sessions <br /> The attorney general has advised that executive sessions of a city council must be open to the public. <br /> 3. Committees and liaisons <br /> The attorney general has advised that standing committees appointed by a governing body also are <br /> likely subject to the open meeting law. <br /> Many city councils create committees to make recommendations to the council.Commonly,such <br /> committees will be responsible for researching a particular area and submitting a recommendation <br /> to the council for its approval.Such committees are often labeled as advisory,and the council is still <br /> responsible for making the final decision.The law is not clear when these types of committees or <br /> citizen panels are subject to the Open Meeting Law.Courts often do a fact analysis when reviewing <br /> Open Meeting Law challenges involving so-called"advisory"committees to determine if the <br /> committee represents a standing committee whose recommendations the council generally or always <br /> follows,or if the committee acts in more of an ad hoc advisory capacity.Many cities err on the side of <br /> caution and follow Open Meeting Law guidelines for all its citizen advisory committees. <br /> A Good Start to Good Governance League of Minnesota Cities <br />