Laserfiche WebLink
8 <br /> • Exceptions and the procedures to use them <br /> There are some exceptions to the open meeting law.Under certain circumstances,some meetings may <br /> be closed.There are also some meetings that must be closed.Before a meeting can be closed under any <br /> of the exceptions,the council must state on the record the specific grounds permitting the meeting to be <br /> closed and describe the subject to be discussed.All closed meetings,except those closed as permitted by <br /> the attorney-client privilege,must be electronically recorded at the expense of the public body.Unless <br /> otherwise provided by law,the recordings must be preserved for at least three years after the date of the <br /> meeting. <br /> 1. Meetings that may be closed <br /> The public body may choose to close certain meetings.The following types of meetings may be <br /> closed: <br /> • Meetings to consider strategies for labor negotiations under PELRA.Although a meeting to <br /> consider strategies for labor negotiations may be closed,the actual negotiations must be done at an <br /> open meeting if a quorum of the council is present. <br /> Procedure.The following must be done to use this exception: <br /> — Before closing the meeting,the council must decide to close the meeting by a majority vote at a <br /> public meeting. <br /> — Before closing the meeting,the council must state on the record the specific grounds permitting <br /> the meeting to be closed and describe the subject to be discussed. <br /> — A written roll of all people present at the closed meeting must be available to the public after <br /> the closed meeting. <br /> — The meeting must be tape-recorded. <br /> — The recording must be kept for two years after the contract is signed. <br /> — The recording becomes public after all labor agreements are signed by the city council for the <br /> current budget period. <br /> If an action claiming that other public business was transacted at the closed meeting is brought <br /> during the time the tape is not public,the court will review the recording privately.If it finds no <br /> violation of the open meeting law,the action will be dismissed and the recording will be preserved <br /> in court records until it becomes available to the public.If the court determines there may have <br /> been a violation,the entire recording may be introduced at the trial.However,the court may issue <br /> appropriate protective orders requested by either party. <br /> • Meetings to evaluate the performance of an individual subject to the public body's authority. <br /> Procedure.The following must be done to use this exception: <br /> — The public body must identify the individual to be evaluated prior to closing the meeting. <br /> — The meeting must be open at the request of the individual who is the subject of the meeting, <br /> so some advance notice to the individual is needed in order to allow the individual to make an <br /> informed decision. <br /> — Before closing the meeting,the council must state on the record the specific grounds permitting <br /> the meeting to be closed and describe the subject to be discussed. <br /> — The meeting must be electronically recorded,and the recording must be preserved for at least <br /> three years after the meeting. <br /> — At the next open meeting,the public body must summarize its conclusions regarding the evaluation. <br /> The council should be careful not to release private or confidential data in its summary. <br /> • Attorney-client privilege.Meetings between the governing body and its attorney to discuss active, <br /> threatened,or pending litigation may be closed when the balancing of the purposes served by <br /> the attorney-client privilege against those served by the open meeting law dictates the need for <br /> absolute confidentiality.The need for absolute confidentiality should relate to litigation strategy, <br /> and will usually arise only after a substantive decision on the underlying matter has been made. <br /> This privilege may not be abused to suppress public observations of the decision-making process, <br /> and does not include situations where the council will be receiving general legal opinions and <br /> advice on the strengths and weaknesses of a proposed underlying action that may give rise to <br /> future litigation. <br /> A Good Start to Good Governance League of Minnesota Cities <br />