Laserfiche WebLink
Dangerous Dog Enforcement and Contested Hearing Process <br />February 26, 2014 <br />Page 5 of 5 <br />3. Introductory comments by City/Police Department staff— 5 minutes. <br />4. Appellant, Mr. Traxler, by himself or through his legal counsel, shall have the <br />opportunity to be heard by the City Council and to show why the Police Department's <br />dangerous dog declarations, or either of them, should be overruled or amended — 15 <br />minutes. <br />5. City/Police Department staff presentation of evidence that Mr. Traxler's dogs, Kuda and <br />Koko, satisfy the statutory definition of dangerous dog and opportunity to rebut evidence <br />submitted by and/or respond to arguments made by Mr. Traxler or his legal counsel — 15 <br />minutes. <br />6. Questions from City Council members. <br />7. Close public hearing and record — Mayor Adams. <br />8. City Council deliberations on the issue. <br />9. City Council make motion and to approve resolution making factual findings and order <br />affirming or overruling the February 12, 2014 dangerous dog declarations. <br />Please do not hesitate to contact us with any questions. <br />Thank you. <br />CMH/RTS <br />