My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12 - Clerk's Monthly Report
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2009
>
12-01-2009 Council Meeting
>
12 - Clerk's Monthly Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/23/2014 11:26:32 AM
Creation date
6/23/2014 11:23:59 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
OR <br />EDC Minutes <br />November 17, 2009 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />municipal consent but people feel like they need more communication regarding <br />the process. She also noted that Planning and Zoning does not have a great <br />reputation. She explained that although there is a Downtown Plan, most people <br />feel that the plan will never happen due to the cost. She stated that the Group <br />wants a plan that will work and more communication with the City. Kimberly also <br />stated that the people on City Council are not seen participating in local events. <br />Kimberly stated that the recent passing of the Resolution indicating no <br />development along the bypass is seen by a few people as the city is trying to take <br />steps to be proactive. <br />The EDC thanked Kimberly for her comments. <br />4. Hannah Prochniak — Marketing Proposal <br />Hannah was not present. <br />SWOT Analysis Discussion <br />Sheila Haverkamp talked about the SWOT (strengths weaknesses opportunities <br />and threats) that was recently done by John Rhodes. She questioned whether this <br />`. would be something that the EDC would like to do for Pequot Lakes? The EDC <br />discussed the idea and felt that it would be beneficial to the City. Sheila suggested <br />that the EDC could gather the information and then possibly have an outside <br />entity review and summarize the information. She indicated that this information <br />could be used as a tool to market the community. <br />Pat Smith suggested a facilitator to work with small groups so everyone is doing <br />this in the same manner. Mark Jurchen suggested doing a SWOT both the <br />community and businesses. Sheila indicated that she could pursue grants through <br />the Initiative Foundation. Justin Bolz - Andolshek stated he would be willing to <br />volunteer his time to assist. <br />The EDC discussed the process to proceed locally with a SWOT. Ed Larsen stated <br />that the first thing we should do is to decide what we are looking for (what do we <br />want to know and where do we get that information). <br />It was the consensus of the EDC to have a preliminary meeting with a couple of <br />EDC members, Sheila Haverkamp, and the Initiative Foundation before the next <br />EDC meeting to look at the process and cost. The committee would then present a <br />proposal at the next meeting. <br />The EDC discussed the purpose of a SWOT. The EDC stated that the purpose <br />would be to get a perspective from a wide variety of people as to what is needed <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.