Laserfiche WebLink
g. The subject properry is not adjacent to municipal water and wastewater utilities. <br /> Proposed"Tract A"contains a compliant SSTS and proposed"Tract B"contains sufficient <br /> space for a primary and alternate SSTS location. <br /> 6. The property is suitable in its natural state for the intended purpose and this lot split would <br /> not be harmfiil to the health,safety,or welfare of future residents or of the community. <br /> �. The applicant is not proposing any provisions for water-based recreation. <br /> 8. The proposed lot layout meets the requirements of the ordinance. <br /> g. The proposed side lot lines are at right angles to the adjacent property lines. <br /> io. Each of the proposed parcels has at least 33-feet of frontage on public right-of-way. <br /> ii. The subject property meets the requirements of the code for stormwater management. <br /> i2. There are no public streets proposed within the devel�rnent. <br /> � <br /> Roll Call Vote: Birch-AYE; Hallan-AYE; Q�n'-AYE; and Wilson-AYE. <br /> . . L��"� <br /> Moiion carried. , '���� �� <br /> 6. Old Business ���% <br /> 6.1 Potential Ordinance Amendment Discussion—Water priented Accessory <br /> Structures <br /> Mr. Burslie e�lained the Staff Report. � `` ��� <br /> i; _ <br /> Discussion ensued regarding pro�.ert�v���e impact, opi�ions of lake associations and <br /> DNR guidelines. <br /> Bill King,via Zoom,stipports the ameri�ent�#h;�oxdinance as long as the structures <br /> are in good conditibn a�cl up to�tandard�,��� � / <br /> The Commission agreed to postpone the disct�ssion until the January 2i, 2o2i meeting <br /> after receivirig:in.formatio�frdm:the DN�t.Th�Commission would also schedule a <br /> public���g in�ebruary if DNR approVal is re�eived in January. <br /> ,. <br /> �:2 ����, Potential�rd�nance Amendment Discussion—Guest Cottages/Guest <br /> w <br /> �uarters <br /> Mr. Burslie eic�l�ined the St�tff`Report. <br /> i <br /> Discussion ensuecl r�garding lo,#size, possibility of renting the guest cottage/guest <br /> quarters, opinions of�lak�'assdciations and DNR guidelines. <br /> The Commission agreed to postpone the discussion until the January 2i, 2o2i meeting <br /> after receiving information from the DNR The Commission would also schedule a <br /> public hearing in February if DNR approval is received in January. <br /> �. Approval of Minutes <br /> �.i Approval of October 15, 202o Minutes <br /> MINUTES 2 <br /> Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br /> November ig, 2020 <br />