My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06.02 - Rezoning from Shoreline Res to Rural Res
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2009
>
10-06-2009 Council Meeting
>
06.02 - Rezoning from Shoreline Res to Rural Res
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2014 10:03:20 AM
Creation date
6/19/2014 10:01:28 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
APPLICANT: LeRoy Tulenchik <br />Applicant requests Rezoning from Shoreline Residential and Open Space to Rural <br />Residential <br />Mr. Marohn explained the Staff Report. Lori Tulenchik was present representing <br />applicant. Mr. Marohn stated this request is consistent with the City's future plans and <br />recommends approval. <br />Mark Meixner stated that a piece of property is being rezoned that hasn't been split off <br />yet. Mr. Marohn stated a parcel can have multiple zoning classifications. <br />Public Comment: <br />Gina Meixner, Prime North GMAC — the little piece of property, the lot line adjustment, <br />is that being included? Mr. Marohn stated it will be part of the subdivision and the lot <br />line will be discussed then. <br />Public comment closed. <br />A motion was made by Tom Adams, seconded by John Derksen, to recommend the City <br />Council approve the request to Rezone Tract B and the property overlap area from <br />Shoreline Residential to Rural Residential based on the following Findings of Fact: <br />1. The rezoning to Rural Residential is consistent with Future Land Use Map, which <br />designates the property as Rural Residential. <br />2. Rezoning to Rural Residential is keeping with the purpose and intent of the <br />Ordinance as it will be allowing a non - shoreland property to be zoned consistent <br />with its current use and the Future Land Use Map. <br />3. The surrounding properties are zoned Shoreline Residential and Commercial. <br />Rural Residential and Shoreline Residential are compatible with each other. The <br />Commercial Zone may not be in an area that is completely surrounded by <br />Residential however the zoning to the north and south of the Commercial property <br />is still Commercial. <br />4. The Rural Residential Zone may be established next to the Commercial Zone or <br />the Shoreline Residential Zone. <br />5. The rezoning to Rural Residential (with the proposed lot split) meets the lot, use, <br />and density requirements. <br />All members voted "aye ". Motion carried. <br />APPLICANT: City of Pequot Lakes <br />Applicant requests Adoption of a Grow Zone Overlay Map <br />Mr. Marohn explained the Staff Report. He proposes the Grow Zone area be bounded by <br />Sibley Street to the north, along Woodman to the south, Second Street and Front Street to <br />the west and County Road 112 and Old Highway 371 to the east. It would include all <br />properties within and on both sides of the boundary streets. <br />Minutes 9 <br />Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br />September 17, 2009 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.