Laserfiche WebLink
Dawn Bittner <br /> From: Mark Jurchen <lowhat@tds.net> <br /> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2020 12:36 PM <br /> To: Dawn Bittner <br /> Subject: FW: Pequot Lakes Ordinance Amendments <br /> Follow Up Flag: Follow up <br /> Flag Status: Flagged <br /> From: Kirby Koster [mailto:kirby@clubkoster.com] <br /> Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2020 9:19 AM <br /> To: ]effrey Benson <br /> Cc: Jon Fogarty; Deb &Dave; Joe Peterson; ]ohn Fontecchio; John Murphy; Mari Irmiter; Mark]urchen; Mike Ridgley; <br /> Pete Clement; Ryan Schlueter; Sean Kanesiki; Steve Caouette; Timothy Paulus; timothy.m.paulus@usace.army.mil <br /> Subject: Re: Pequot Lakes Ordinance Amendments <br /> +1 -These both seem like reasonable proposals that would give property owners some additional <br /> flexibility without having a major impact on the lake. <br /> If I had a concern with the boathouses, it would be that the shoreline starts to look like a city compared to the <br /> more natural feel we have now. But many properties have a boathouse of some sort from the old days,have <br /> built temporary racks for their kayaks/canoes/paddle boards, or their elevation is such that their entire cabin is <br /> close to the water anyway. I don't think a couple more boathouses is going to be a big change and like Jon said, <br /> getting some of this equipment inside a nice shed may actually look better. <br /> Kirby <br /> On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 8:54 AM Jeffrey Benson<jefebenl��grriail.com>wrote: <br /> I agree with Jon and would be in favor of supporting this from a Sibley Lake board position. Since Pequot <br /> Lakes is asking for lake association's feedback this would be a great opportunity to influence an amendment to <br /> the current building ordinance. <br /> Jefe <br /> On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 08:45 Jon Fogarty<jon(cl�landsenddev.com>wrote: <br /> Good morning Sibley crew, <br /> I wanted to weigh in on this. <br /> At work, we build a number of cabins/lake homes in Crow Wing County. With the shore land ordinance in <br /> CW, property owners are allowed a 1Ox12 or 120 sq feet water orientated accessory structure with a 20 foot <br /> setback from OHW and 10 foot side yard setback. I've always wondered why PL doesn't allow them. On <br /> Sibley many have them already as they were built long ago. I would be in favor of allowing them. They are <br /> convenient for property owners for their lake storage needs, would keep shorelines cleaner IMO, and <br /> i <br />