My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06 - Planning & Zoning Report
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2009
>
09-01-2009 Council Meeting
>
06 - Planning & Zoning Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2014 11:49:21 AM
Creation date
6/18/2014 11:47:14 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Habein stated that with the proposed walkout excavation, there will be a sheer wall to <br />the neighbor. This will create a severe problem. Mr. Hallan stated a construction <br />easement would be required from the neighbor. <br />Mr. Williams verified that the retaining walls indicated on the survey are already in place. <br />There is no work being done in the Shore Impact Zone. The existing deck does not meet <br />the setback. The house does meet the setback. The applicant proposes to add two <br />retaining walls. He stated that there would be little runoff into the lake with the rock <br />retaining walls in place. He questioned the potential impact to the lake. Mr. Hallan <br />stated that silt fence would be required. <br />When asked by Mr. Williams, Mr. Caouette stated that the crawl space is now four feet. <br />When asked by Mr. Williams, Mr. Caouette stated that they plan to lift the house in <br />sections, under pinning the house, raise the house, remove the foundation, add the blocks <br />and set it down again. <br />Mr. Hallan stated that if it can be picked up it can be moved over to meet the setbacks. <br />Mr. Williams asked if they moved the dwelling could they do the walkout if it was <br />outside the 75 foot setback. Mr. Hallan stated there is room to reposition the home so it <br />is conforming. Mr. Marohn stated that they would need a variance for dirt moving. <br />Mr. Habein suggested tabling the request so the applicant can contact his builder to see if <br />they can come up with something more agreeable. <br />Mr. Caouette stated that there is a four foot crawl space now; they would only be going <br />an additional four feet deeper. <br />Mr. Hallan stated that a basement without a walkout or a basement with a small walkout <br />would be more desirable. Something with less impact and be less visible from the lake. <br />Applicant may want to go back to the builder and come back with another request. <br />Mr. Marohn reiterated that an expansion of a non - conforming dwelling requires a <br />variance. Maintenance is allowed. <br />Mr. Pederson and Mr. Derksen stated they couldn't vote for this, but there are other <br />options. <br />The Planning Commission would like to see an alternative for a full basement, see what <br />the difficulty would be to moving the structure to make it conforming and is open to <br />considering a walkout so long as it does not extend beyond the existing deck. They <br />would also like to know the amount of material that needs to be moved. <br />Applicant will bring back additional information. <br />Minutes 4 <br />Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br />August 20, 2009 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.