Laserfiche WebLink
Benefits for the local board <br />The benefit for the local board is that an open book <br />meeting saves time for board members. It eliminates the <br />need for the board to become familiar with and educated <br />on the local real estate market. Board members will be <br />able to spend this time concentrating on their other <br />duties as town board or city council members. In <br />addition, board members can avoid confrontational <br />situations with constituents and will no longer be put <br />into difficult situations by having to make decisions <br />about the property values or classifications of property <br />owned by friends and neighbors. <br />Benefits for the county <br />While the number of appeals made at the open book <br />meeting may not be less than the number of appeals to <br />the local board, the benefit for the county is that the open <br />book process allows for immediate consideration of <br />issues, and in many cases, appeals are resolved before <br />the County Board of Appeal and Equalization. The <br />process is efficient for the county because it can often <br />consolidate several jurisdictions into one meeting (or a <br />series of meetings) instead of holding at least one <br />meeting in each jurisdiction. <br />Option 1: ransferring assessment and local <br />oar uties to the county <br />The town board or city council may transfer the <br />powers and duties of the Local Board of Appeal and <br />Equalization to the county board (under Minnesota <br />Statutes, Section 274.0 1, subdivision 3) and no <br />longer perform the function of a Local Board of <br />Appeal and Equalization. <br />However, in order to exercise this option, the local <br />jurisdiction also must have its assessment done by the <br />county. This means that the local jurisdiction must give <br />up its local assessor. Some jurisdictions do not see this <br />as an option, because they have no intention of <br />relinquishing this power to the county. For other town <br />boards or city councils, this may be a good option. <br />Before transferring the powers and duties to the county <br />board, the town board or city council shall give public <br />notice of the meeting at which the proposal for transfer <br />is to be considered (the public notice shall follow the <br />procedure contained in Minnesota Statutes, <br />Section 13D.04, subdivision 2). <br />Explanations of alternate methods of appeal <br />A town board or city council that wishes to transfer the <br />assessment and local board duties to the county board <br />must communicate this intent in writing to the county <br />assessor before December 1 of any year to be effective <br />for the following year's assessment. This transfer of <br />duties may either be permanent or for a specified <br />number of years. However, the duties must be <br />transferred to the county board for a minimum of three <br />years, and the length of the transfer must be stated in <br />writing. A town or city may renew its option to transfer <br />its duties to the county board. <br />Property owners in jurisdictions that have chosen this <br />option would be provided with an open book meeting in <br />place of the Local Board of Appeal and Equalization. <br />Property owners who are not satisfied with the outcome <br />of the open book meeting may appeal to the County <br />Board of Appeal and Equalization and/or to Tax Court. <br />Option 2: Transferring local board duties to the <br />county <br />Previously, the only option for transferring the local <br />board duties to the county board meant that the local <br />jurisdiction had to give up its local assessor as well. <br />Some jurisdictions saw this option as a loss of control, <br />and therefore, it wasn't considered to be an option for <br />the city or town. <br />The quorum and training requirements for local boards <br />were implemented to improve the local board process so <br />that the boards function fairly and objectively. The intent <br />of the legislation was not to force or require a city or <br />town to give up its local assessor. However, a <br />jurisdiction that fails to meet these requirements must <br />transfer the duties of the Local Board of Appeal and <br />Equalization to the County Board of Appeal and <br />Equalization. In this situation, the jurisdiction would <br />lose the right to hold its local board, but it would be able <br />to retain its local assessor. <br />It seems unfair that a jurisdiction which voluntarily <br />transfers its Local Board of Appeal and Equalization <br />duties to the County Board of Appeal and Equalization <br />must give up its local assessor, while a local board that <br />must transfer its duties to the county board for failing <br />to meet the training or quorum requirements may retain <br />its local assessor. <br />