My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04.01 City Council Minutes
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2020
>
04-07-2020 City Council Meeting
>
04.01 City Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2020 3:49:39 PM
Creation date
4/1/2020 11:24:09 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SPECIAL MEETING OF THE PEQUOT LAKES CITY COUNCIL <br /> TUESDAY, MARCH 17, 2020 <br /> PEQUOT LAKES CITY HALL <br /> Members Present: Mayor Tayloe, Council Members Ciement, Pederson, Seils, and <br /> Swanson <br /> Staff Present: Nancy Malecha, City Administrator; Chelsea Bodin, City Attorney <br /> (via teleconference) <br /> 1. Call Meetin� to Order <br /> Mayor Tayloe called the special meeting of the Pequot Lakes City Council to <br /> order at 6:30 p.m. <br /> 1.1. Pledqe of Alleaiance <br /> Mayor Tayloe led with the Pledge of Allegiance. <br /> 2. Consider Actenda <br /> COUNCIL MEMBER SEILS MOVED TO APPROVE THE AGENDA AS <br /> PRESENTED. COUNCIL MEMBER CLEMENT SECONDED THE MOTION. <br /> MOTION CARRIED 5-0. <br /> 3. Threatened Litiqation from Citv of Pequot Lakes Emplovee Related to <br /> Emplovment with the Citv Pursuant to Minnesota Statute 13D.05, Subd. 3(b) <br /> Mayor Tayloe stated that the City's need for absolute confidentiality outweighs <br /> the purposes served by the open meeting law in this case based on the following. <br /> • The City Council and legal counsel, participating by teleconference, need <br /> to have a candid and open discussion to determine the available legal <br /> options to handle threatened litigation from a former City of Pequot Lakes <br /> employee related to employment with the City based on actions the City <br /> has already taken, including response strategy and possible areas of <br /> reconciliation. <br /> • The purpose of the closed meeting is not to make a decision behind <br /> closed-doors, but instead the purpose of the meeting is to determine the <br /> legal options for handling the threatened litigation. <br /> • The only business to be discussed is the threatened litigation. <br /> • An open session would be detrimental because it may take place in the <br /> presence of individuals involved in the threatened litigation. <br /> • A closed session would benefit the public because the ultimate outcome <br /> of the threatened litigation may impact the finances, operations, and <br /> reputation of the City. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.