My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4(c) Splash Pad Discussion and Research
Laserfiche
>
Parks
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020
>
03-17-2020 Park Commission Meeting
>
4(c) Splash Pad Discussion and Research
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2020 10:19:37 AM
Creation date
3/13/2020 10:19:36 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
o Recommended a rnore kidney bean stiape design like we described Deerwood's, which <br /> wouid allow for rnore efficient use of space and potential for expansior� if desired. <br /> • Theirs was not from CRS (Deerwood's was) so it is configured a little differently. <br /> • Their control panel was actually protected and stored in the back-utility room of their nearby <br /> public restroom. <br /> o Daniel recommended this type of setup arid Andy and I thought this was a great way to <br /> protect equipment and reduce vandalism risks. <br /> • When asked about vandalism, he did indicate it had been an issue numerous tirnes since being <br /> built. They're police now installed cameras in the area to hopefully remedy it, <br /> • Also recommended to NOT use paper towels in the restroom (blowers) as they've had issues <br /> with them ending up on the splashpad plugging drains, etc. <br /> • They have 2 fountains nearby the splashpad (on outside of bathroom). <br /> • They thought theirs was using 18,000 GPD to 20,000 GPD (originally up to 37,000 GPD prior to <br /> throttling valves down). <br /> • Ask leff at our meeting about adjustability and programmability potential. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.