My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06.01 Planning Commission Report
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2020
>
02-04-2020 City Council Meeting
>
06.01 Planning Commission Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2020 12:47:27 PM
Creation date
1/30/2020 12:47:26 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
We should look into this; it would be more attractive. One of the 12 volt actually turns <br /> with the flag. <br /> Chair Birch is in favor of the downward facing options. The Bobber Tower lights are <br /> very bright. Any of the upward facing options will contribute to light pollution. It is <br /> very difficult to see any stars in town; it is a quality of life issue. It is not in our best <br /> interest as a Planning Commission to allow upward facing lighting in the Public zone <br /> only. He is very hesitant to allow the City to do something the citizens can't do. <br /> PUBLIC COMMENT OPENED: <br /> Dan Ronning, Chair of Park Commission — Mr. Ronning stated he planned to propose <br /> up-lighting but was unable to find suitable up-lighting. The proposals provided by <br /> Planning Commission Member Wilson sound like they would work. Light pollution is <br /> not an issue for him. He asked how the addition of lighting on the top would affect the <br /> 3o foot flagpole. <br /> Chair Birch strongly recommended not using solar lighting unless there are strong <br /> testimonials to support it. Discussion ensued regarding the different hard-wired <br /> examples Planning Commission Member Wilson had provided. <br /> Mr. Ronning suggested a light on the pole 8 to �2 feet from the ground. That would be <br /> easy to maintain and too high for vandalism. Maintenance at the top of the pole during <br /> the winter is an issue. He is in favor of an up-lighting system on the pole. <br /> PUBLIC COMMENT CLOSED. <br /> It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that alternatives to up-lighting should <br /> be researched. <br /> A motion was made by Planning Commission Member Paulbeck, seconded <br /> by Planning Commission Member Larson, to table the public hearing to <br /> research alternatives to up-lighting. All members voted"aye". Motion <br /> carried. <br /> Public Hearings closed. <br /> ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO AGENDA: None. <br /> OPEN FORiTM: None. <br /> MINUTES 5 <br /> Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br /> January 16, 2020 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.