My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06.01 Planning Commission Report
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2019
>
08-06-2019 City Council Meeting
>
06.01 Planning Commission Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2019 12:41:39 PM
Creation date
8/1/2019 12:41:37 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
All members voted "aye". Motion carried. <br /> b. Nathan Walberg— Discussion <br /> Mr. Burslie explained the City reached out to Mr. Walberg requesting an onsite visit. <br /> Mr. Walberg responded with the letter on the table that he doesn't feel it is necessary to <br /> discuss the matter further. <br /> The driveway appears to be kept open and that there is a customer parking area. It was <br /> the consensus of the Planning Commission to be optimistic that Mr. Walberg will <br /> continue to meet his deadlines. <br /> c. Ordinance Amendment — Interim Uses, Discussion <br /> Mr. Burslie explained Staff was directed to include the Land Use Matrix and have a <br /> discussion regarding Interim Uses. Interim Uses are very simiiar to Conditional Uses, <br /> but it has an end date or event that terminates the Use. <br /> Mr. Burslie stated some cities have listed some commercial uses as IUP's rather than <br /> CUP's,which can be detrimental to commercial development. Some businesses won't <br /> invest in that city when their permit ends at a specific time. <br /> When asked, Mr. Burslie stated a use must be either Interim Use or Conditional Use; <br /> they can't be labeled C/I as Staff can't choose which one to use. The example was <br /> Commercial Use, Other. <br /> The Planning Commission was directed to review the matrix for next month. <br /> OLD BUSINESS: <br /> a. Heart of the Good Life Development — Zoning Standards <br /> Mr. Burslie explained we should determine a new name for this area, rather than <br /> HOTGL. Staff was directed to strike the impervious coverage language highlighted in <br /> yellow, as well as the minimum parking standards for athletic fields. <br /> Vice-Chair Birch stated the Fire Chief has commented that structure height can be 35 <br /> feet,but do we also need to require a setback for rooftop equipment to provide access <br /> for firefighters. Planning Commission Member Norton stated the rooftop equipment is <br /> generally placed in the center of the building, not the edge of the roof. Staff was directed <br /> to contact the Fire Chief for his comments regarding screening of rooftop equipment. It <br /> was the consensus of the Planning Commission to change structure height to 35 feet. <br /> Outdoor Recreation — do not include sport stadiums. Strike fencing and locked gate <br /> around ball fields. <br /> MINUTES 6 <br /> Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br /> July i8, 2oi9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.