My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3(e) Amend Conditional Use Permit for Exterior Storage
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
2019
>
06-20-2019 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting
>
3(e) Amend Conditional Use Permit for Exterior Storage
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/20/2019 9:06:26 AM
Creation date
6/17/2019 12:10:32 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2. The proposed trees to provide screening along the western property line shall be planted <br /> within one year of the date of permit approval. <br /> 3. The proposed alternate alignment will run adjacent to this property. To provide screening <br /> of the outside storage as viewed from the proposed alternate alignment,the property owner <br /> shall install screening, consisting of evergreen trees and fencing or other similar materials, <br /> which would provide 100% screening of the exterior storage area as viewed from the <br /> highway, within six (6)months of the road completion. <br /> One-hundred percent screening was discussed. That is a relative number and there cannot be 100% <br /> screening at all times. We could change Condition No. 3 to state"adequate" screening of exterior <br /> storage area. <br /> Mr. Williams stated that this is not a Variance public hearing. We must keep the fence height at <br /> 84 inches. The Planning Commission also clarified that the screening on the east is for the wood <br /> piles, not the structure. They also agreed to leave Condition No. 3 at 100% screening. <br /> Mr. Adams and Mr. Pederson amended Condition No. 1 of their motion to state a fence not <br /> exceeding 7 feet in height. <br /> The Planning Commission was concerned that the materials stored were not indigenous to the area <br /> and there might possibly be contamination. Mr. Andersen stated that cedar is resistant to insects. <br /> All trees they would store have been down for 1 'h years. <br /> Mr.Andersen asked for a clarification on the screening on the east side. The Planning Commission <br /> stated the screening is due to visibility from the proposed highway. It should be as fully screened <br /> as possible. The trees can be within the 10-foot setback. <br /> ROLL CALL VOTE: Mr. Habein: Aye;Mr.Adams: Aye;Mr. Williams: Aye;Mr. Hallan: Aye; <br /> Mr. Pederson: Aye. 5 Ayes. Motion carried. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.