Laserfiche WebLink
2. The lot widths of the proposed parcels both meet the minimum standard of 200 <br /> feet. <br /> 3. Both of the proposed parcels meet the minimum buildable area requirements of 5 <br /> acres in the Rural Residential Zone. <br /> 4. Proposed"Tract A and Tract B" are vacant. <br /> 5. The subject property is not adjacent to municipal water and wastewater utilities. <br /> Proposed"Tract A and Tract B"contain sufficient space for a primary and alternate <br /> SSTS location. <br /> 6. There is a wetland located in the northwest corner of subject property. <br /> �. The property is suitable in its natural state for the intended purpose and this lot <br /> split would not be harmful to the health, safety, or welfare of future residents or of <br /> the community. <br /> 8. The applicant is not proposing any provisions for water-based recreation. <br /> 9. The proposed lot layout meets the requirements of the ordinance. <br /> io.The proposed side lot lines are at right angles to the adjacent property lines. <br /> ii. Each of the proposed parcels has at least 33-feet of frontage on public right-of-way <br /> on Little Walnut Lane, a 33-foot wide ingress and egress easement. <br /> i2. The subject property meets the requirements of the code for stormwater <br /> management. <br /> i3. There are no public streets proposed within the development. <br /> All members voted "aye". Motion carried. <br /> c. Metes and Bounds Subdivision — <br /> Adam Bitzer, applicant <br /> Mr. Burslie explained the Staff Report. Applicant was present. <br /> A motion was made by Planning Commission Member Wilson, seconded by <br /> Planning Commission Member Hallan, to approve the Metes and Bounds <br /> Subdivision, based on the following Findings of Fact: <br /> i. The subject properry is zoned Rural Residential. <br /> 2. The lot widths of the proposed parcels both meet the minimum standard of 200 <br /> feet. <br /> 3. Both of the proposed parcels meet the minimum buildable area requirements of 5 <br /> acres in the Rural Residential Zone. <br /> 4. Proposed"Tract A and Tract B" are vacant. <br /> 5. The subject property is not adjacent to municipal water and wastewater utilities. <br /> Proposed"Tract A and Tract B"contain sufficient space for a primary and alternate <br /> SSTS location. <br /> 6. The property is suitable in its natural state for the intended purpose and this lot <br /> split would not be harmful to the health, safety, or welfare of future residents or of <br /> the community. <br /> �. The applicant is not proposing any provisions for water-based recreation. <br /> 8. The proposed lot layout meets the requirements of the ordinance. <br /> 9. The proposed side lot lines are at right angles to the adjacent properry lines. <br /> io.Each of the proposed parcels has at least 33-feet of frontage on public right-of-way. <br /> MINUTES 22 <br /> Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br /> April i8, 2oi9 <br />