Laserfiche WebLink
Morehouse Drive and Schmidt Way. In addition, this property is served by City <br /> sanitary and storm sewer. <br /> subject to the following conditions: <br /> 1. To prevent unwanted visitors and for safety, the exterior storage area shall be <br /> fenced in with a fence not eaceeding 7 or 8 feet in height. This fence sha11 be <br /> installed prior to any wood being stored in the azea. <br /> 2. The proposed trees to provide screening along the western property line sha11 be <br /> planted within one year of the da.te of permit approval. <br /> 3. The proposed alternate alignment will run adjacent to this properly. To provide <br /> screening of the outside storage as viewed from the proposed alternate alignment, <br /> the property owner shall install screening, consisting of evergreen trees and <br /> fencing or other similaz materials, wluch would provide 100% screening of the <br /> exterior storage azea as viewed from the highway, within suc (6) months of the <br /> road completion. <br /> One-hundred percent screening was discussed. That is a relative number and there <br /> cannot be 100% screening at all times. We could change Condition No. 3 to state <br /> "adequate"screening of exterior storage area.. <br /> Mr. Williams stated that this is not a Variance public hearing. We must keep the fence <br /> height at 84 inches. The Planning Commission also clarified that the screening on the <br /> east is for the wood piles, not the structure. They also agreed to leave Condition No. 3 at <br /> 100%screening. <br /> Mr. Adams and Mr. Pederson amended Condition No. 1 of their motion to state a fence <br /> not exceeding 7 feet in height. <br /> The Planning Commission was concerned that the materials stored were not indigenous <br /> to the azea and there might possibly be contamination. Mr. Andersen stated that cedar is <br /> resistant to insects. All trees they would store have been down for 1 %Z yeazs. <br /> Mr. Andersen asked for a clarification on the screening on the east side. The Planning <br /> Commission stated the screening is due to visibility from the proposed highway. It <br /> should be as fully screened as possible. The trees can be within the 10-foot setback. <br /> ROLL CALL VOTE: Mr. Habein: Aye; Mr. Adams: Aye; Mr. Williams: Aye; Mr. <br /> Hallan: Aye;Mr. Pederson: Aye. 5 Ayes. Motion carried. <br /> Applicant: Lonesome Cottage Furnitare Company <br /> Applicant requests a Variance for a Structure Eaceeding the Height Limit <br /> Mr. Marohn explained the Staff Report. Applicant, Brandon Andersen, was present. Mr. <br /> Marohn suggested that the Planning Commission may want to consider an Ordinance <br /> amendment in the future. This is the second request for this type of Variance. <br /> Minutes 3 <br /> Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br /> August 16,2007 <br />