Laserfiche WebLink
compelling evidence exists that the overall impact to businesses and the City's tax base <br />would be positive. There were no indications that an alternate route would be destructive to <br />the economic health of the City of Pequot Lakes, and substantial evidence to the contrary..' <br />The Study also found that the direct costs that the City would incur during the project would <br />be substantially less for the alternate route than for the through -city alternative. <br />2. Numerous comments .suggested constructing Highway 371 as a four -lane divided highway on <br />the existing alignment would f n-ther divide the Pequot Lakes business district. <br />Response: The preferred alternative does not include expansion of the existing alignment <br />through the Pequot Lakes business district. <br />Environmental /Natural Resource (3 Comments) <br />1. One comment, including pictures, claimed the presence of -a pond (not identified in the <br />SFEIS) that maybe affected by the proposed project. <br />Response: MnIDOT was not granted access to the - property to verb the size and/or features <br />of the pond noted in this comment. However, based on a review of the photos provided by <br />the commenter, the basin appears to be approximately 0. 05 acre in size and vegetated with <br />mostly watercress, red canary grass and some tussock sedge, although species identification <br />is very difficult from a picture: MWDOT will inventory and map the location of <br />wetlands /water bodies on this property to determine impacts and explore avoidance, <br />minimization, and mitigation measures when access to this property can be- obtained. <br />2. One comment claimed the presence of Blanding's Turtle, a Threatened Species in Minnesota, <br />on their property. <br />Response: Blanding's turtles are a state Threatened Species. MWDOT was not granted <br />access to the prop erty'to verify the presence of Blanding's turtles. Some areas of the State <br />have been designated as priority protection areas where large populations exist. This project <br />is not in or near a priority area The MnDNR guidelines and recommendations to protect <br />turtles during construction will be followed <br />3. One comment identified potential impacts to management activities on forested and open <br />space land that would be bisected by the proposed bypass. <br />Response: The proposed bypass will bisect a few forested parcels. Based on available <br />information, large tracts of managed forest land would not be affected. Some of the land is <br />currently in young plantation, agricultural or equestrian uses. Issues related to access to <br />bisected properties will be addressed through the right of way acquisition process. <br />Costs (3 Comments) <br />Several comments questioned the cost effectiveness of the preferred alternative. <br />Response,_ Mn/DOT assesses project cost effectiveness through a benefit -cost ratio analysis <br />process, where a benefit -cost ratio of 1.0 indicates a `break -even' point, and values greater <br />than 1.0 indicating greater benefits. The SMS (Section 1.7 and Appendix R) included the <br />results of the benefit -cost analysis for Alternative 3MOD, indicating a positive benefit -cost <br />ratio of 3. S for the entire corridor from Nisswa to Pine River. <br />TH 371 Adequacy Determination <br />Nisswa to Pine River 18 October 2010 <br />-N <br />