Laserfiche WebLink
public review-and comment on July 26, 2010. Legal Notices were published in the Brainerd <br />Dispatch on July 24, 2010. There were also numerous articles regarding the SFEIS in the <br />Pine River Journal, Lake Country Echo, and Brainerd Dispatch. The draft SFEIS comment <br />period closed on August 9, 2010. <br />In addition to the ElSprocess, there was a public involvement component to the 2007 <br />"Highway 371 Alternate Route Study Group Report, " as described in the response to the <br />previous commentlissue. <br />Right -of -Way /Property Impacts (3 Comments) <br />Comments regarding partial or full property acquisition included property owners against <br />acquisition and general concern regarding the acquisition process of residential and <br />commercial property. This includes access to adjacent property. <br />Response: Where possible, the preferred alternative has been modified to reduce right -of- <br />way impacts. The properties that have been identified for acquisition are either directly <br />impacted by the reconstruction project or are parcels where reasonable access cannot be <br />maintained. Right -of -way acquisition will be conducted in accordance with the Uniform <br />Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended, and <br />49 CFR Part 24. Persons interested in obtaining additional information can contact the <br />Mn/DOT District 3 Right -of -Way Engineer at 218.828.5801. <br />Statements of Preference (24 Comments) <br />1. Numerous comments were received stating a preference for whether or not. the preferred <br />alternative should remain on its existing alignment (Alternative 2) or should bypass the <br />downtown district for the City of Pequot Lakes (Alternative 3 MOD). <br />Response: No response necessw y for statements of preference. <br />Roadway Design (1 Comment) <br />One comment proposed a "compromised solution that would involve slowing traffic down. to <br />30 mph, applying for federal funds to beautify downtown and holding Mn/DOT accountable <br />for the City's portion of the infrastructure costs that would be incurred by the expansion <br />project." <br />Response: The existing posted speed limit is 35mph. The 30 mph proposal would be <br />counterproductive to one of the stated purpose and need components (facilitate traffic flow <br />and reduce congestion). <br />Beautification of downtown Pequot Lakes is not an element of the purpose and need for the <br />project. <br />Mn✓DOT's ability to expend trunk highway funds for construction projects is limited to the <br />State of Minnesota Constitution, Article MV, section 2 and section 6, and by Minnesota <br />Statutes 161.20 related to the construction, improvement and maintenance of the trunk <br />highway system. Based on these legal limitations, a large portion of the infrastructure cost <br />TH 371 Adequacy Determination <br />Nisswa to Pine River 16 October 2010 <br />._1-1 <br />--r <br />