06.01 - Req for Appeal-Dog Boarding-Public Hearing

Home Browse Search

Section 17 -13.5 NOTICES The failure to give mailed notice to individual property owners, or defects in the notice shall not invalidate the proceedings, provided a bonafide attempt to comply with this Chapter has been made. Comment. A bonafide attempt was not made to notify the property owners, or in this case the subdivision owners. Prior, proper notification to the subdivision would have brought the facts presented in this appeal during or prior to the initial CUP hearing. In addition, the property was purchased in the early Spring of 2010 by the applicant which provided for reasonable notification to occur in lieu of 3 property owners. If this is the policy, please change "Shall" to "may" as it is contradictory to say you are obligated to do something and then caveat it at the end by removing the accountability to do so. APPENDIX B ANNEXATION ORDINANCES (NOT CODIFIED) Ordinance No. 181 An ordinance extending the corporate limits of the City of Pequot Lakes to include certain unincorporated property owned by Kirk A. Tulenchik, Tulenchik Land and Development Co., and Michelle Szudy, and abutting upon the limits of the city and repealing inconsistent ordinances. (Adopted 11/2/1998) Ordinance No. 186 An ordinance extending the corporate limits of the City of Pequot Lakes to include certain unincorporated property owned by Sally K. Peterson, Gary L. and Patricia Tweed, and abutting upon the limits of the city, and repealing inconsistent ordinances. (Adopted 11/3/1999) Ordinance No. 192 An ordinance extending the corporate limits of the City of Pequot Lakes to include certain unincorporated property owned by Merlin Carlson and Jill Carlson, and abutting upon the limits of the City, and repealing inconsistent ordinances. (Adopted 10/2/2001) Ordinance No. 193 An ordinance extending the corporate limits of the City of Pequot Lakes to include certain unincorporated property owned by Chris Greer and Brenda Greer, and abutting upon the limits of the City, and repealing inconsistent ordinances. (Adopted 2001) APPENDIX D TABLE OF REPEALED ORDINANCES ORD.# DATE PASSED ORDINANCE DESCRIPTION 164 January 2, 1996 Dog Ordinance — Repeal #143 143 July 14, 1986 Licensing and Regulating the Keeping of Dogs 125 June 9, 1975 Regulating the Keeping of Dogs and Providing for Penalty 124 April 14, 1975 Regulating the Keeping of Dogs 112 April 24, 1962 Dog Licensing January 9, 1928 Dog Ordinance adopted October 3, 1904 Dog License Ordinance �. Comment: Repealing of inconsistent ordinances is common practice along with a long history of dog ordinances. The precedence has been set and the commission's duty is to review, study and recommend repeal of inconsistent ordinances, proactively. Page 20 of 20