Laserfiche WebLink
is happy to have a place to leave her dog closer to home and LaRee is a reasonable person <br />to make this work. <br />George Selvestra, stated his property falls within 350 foot boundary requirement and sent <br />each Planning Commission member a copy of information. He did not know there was a <br />letter from Mr. Garland's attorney. Mr. Thomas' letter stated it will be appropriate to <br />grant approval, it is acceptable in Rural Residential zone. Mr. Thomas states hypothetical <br />barking of dogs; they all bark, it is not hypothetical. As for resulting decreased property <br />values, Mr. Selvestra stated he called about 5 realtors and appraisers. The value as far as <br />appraisal would not decrease unless they can find an exact comp, by an appraiser. The <br />realtors contacted cannot say the value would decrease but the market value would <br />decrease as personal opinion. Bruce Larson of Crosslake could not sell a home for <br />several years with a veterinarian next door. There is a possible decrease in value. He <br />asked if the MPCA standards override the City or would the State or County Ordinances <br />override the City? <br />Mr. Marohn stated his understanding of MPCA noise requirements is that the MPCA <br />would be charged with enforcing their standards and the City would be enforcing ours. <br />However, the City has adopted the MPCA standards and would be enforcing their code. <br />The City Code is enforced by the City. <br />Mr. Selvestra stated the City Code has a mechanism to remedy noise issues but stated <br />Coon Hounds can be heard up to 5 miles. He moved here for peace and quiet. Mr. <br />`-- Marohn explained that the Planning Commission administers the Land Use Code, <br />Chapter 17. The Police Department enforces Chapter 9. We have a noise standard and if <br />the property exceeds that standard it would be violating the Code and the permit would <br />be revoked. <br />Mr. Marohn stated that he is not an attorney, but if there were an ordinance amendment <br />pertaining to this, the ordinance in place at the time of the application would be applied. <br />Any subsequent application would fall under the new code. <br />Bonnie Olson, adjacent property owner, 31160 Eastwood Drive — She is a realtor. She <br />has a copy of the plat of Breezy Pines indicating 5 acre parcels. It is quiet. The map <br />from Google shows not very many woods and trees at the corners. Harly's house is 45 <br />feet away, very close. As a realtor the market values would go down; we don't want to <br />see our market values decrease. She looked at Northland Pet Lodge. There are <br />businesses on either side and within 1/2 to 3/4 mile there are no residential properties <br />around it. There are commercial properties next door. <br />Harley Simchuck — the Pequot Lakes Minutes of February 17, 1998, Kennedy's request <br />for a CUP for a Vet Clinic. It was denied and should be in a zoned area and not in a <br />residential area. This has been at the Planning Commission before. <br />Chairman Woog stated that Planning Commission member Deb Brown was the applicant <br />for that CUP. She submitted a letter earlier. The location was on Government Drive and <br />